Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm just new member of fuji-x-forum.
I want to share some of my shots taken in Switzerland that I called Bus window project.
 
All photos in this project, I've taken from bus window while it's running. 
So I used hyperfocal distance at f8-11 with high speed shutter(500+)
for testing fujifilm mirorless camera performance(speed, focus and high iso).
 
Cameras: X-T10 & X70

 

29681551840_1933c5e94b_k.jpg

trip-2016-switzerland-x70-160413-00174_lr_full

by Wanderer Bear

 

29347908284_80e9309675_k.jpg

trip-2016-switzerland-x70-160419-01397_lr_full

by Wanderer Bear

 

29892738791_cc3e9aa4cf_k.jpg

trip-2016-switzerland-x70-160419-01388_lr_full

by Wanderer Bear

 

29974194145_dbdae736ee_k.jpg

trip-2016-switzerland-xt10-160413-00227_lr_full

by Wanderer Bear

 

29347752934_7465152c00_k.jpgtrip-2016-switzerland-x70-160417-00815-lr_full

by Wanderer Bear

Edited by wandererbear
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
×
×
  • Create New...