Jump to content

I've got a lense problem...latest 16mm/35 2.0

ullmandds

By ullmandds
in Fuji X Lenses

 Share

Recommended Posts

ullmandds Contributor

ullmandds

Posted
Posted

I've been a xt1 guy for about 2 years now...before that mainly canon g's and s's.

 

I have a problem!  I can't stop buying lenses.

 

I have the 14, 23, 35 1.4, 56, 90, 18-135, 12-24, 50-200...and as of this week the 16mm and the 35 2.

 

My first impressions of the 16 is that its not quite wide enough...I think I prefer the 14's crop! 

 

 

And that the 35 2 is not as sharp as the 35 1.4...but if all of the other improvements(size, speed of focus) "trump" image quality...go for it.

 

Have many of you purchased either the 16 or 35/2 only to return them and stick with the older?

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
persco Apprentice

persco

Posted
Posted

I traded in my 35mm 1.4 because it started acting funny. It would suddenly shut down and freeze, and an error message would pop up telling me to turn the camera off and back on. Half a dozen times of this happening and I decided to turn it in and get the 23mm 1.4 instead. Which I love. 

 

I have the 16mm and it's pretty much my favourite lens. No distortion and has great close focus. When I want wider I have the 12mm Rokinon. I find there are times, however that I want something between the 23mm and the 56mm. I find myself missing the FoV of that 35mm. I keep debating whether to get the f2 or to get another f1.4. I'm leaning toward picking up a used f1.4, convinced the copy I had was just a bad apple. I just think the older 1.4 is a bit higher quality, and I don't mind the size and weight compared to the f2. 

 

I'm going to wait until my X-T2 arrives however so I can try them both on the new camera. I want to see how the older 1.4 35mm performs on the new body. Then I'll decide. But I don't really need the 35mm. It's just GAS.

 

First world problems...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Aswald Mentor

Aswald

Posted
Posted

I've been a xt1 guy for about 2 years now...before that mainly canon g's and s's.

 

I have a problem!  I can't stop buying lenses.

 

I have the 14, 23, 35 1.4, 56, 90, 18-135, 12-24, 50-200...and as of this week the 16mm and the 35 2.

 

My first impressions of the 16 is that its not quite wide enough...I think I prefer the 14's crop! 

 

 

And that the 35 2 is not as sharp as the 35 1.4...but if all of the other improvements(size, speed of focus) "trump" image quality...go for it.

 

Have many of you purchased either the 16 or 35/2 only to return them and stick with the older?

 

I don't see your problem? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
ullmandds Contributor

ullmandds

Posted
  • Author
Posted

After shooting for a few days...I returned the 16mm...not sure if I got a bad lens?  I havent heard any instances of that but I was just not happy at all with the results I got.

 

The 35/2 on the other hand is sweet.  But...I love love love the 35 1.4...some of my favorite pics came from this lens...so I'm struggling with this!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
petergabriel Rising Star

petergabriel

Posted
Posted (edited)

I would find a used 35mm f1.4 if I were you. I don't care what people say about the 35mm f2 being better than the f1.4 IQ wise. It simply isn't! The rendering on the f1.4 is unique AND it has optically corrected distortion = no distortion! The f2 is an imberrasment distortion wise - and yes, I don't care whether it is corrected via software.

As for the 16mm I have owned it. And returned it. Just didn't like it. To big. IQ fine, but nothing special.

The 23mm f1.4 is a keeper. I hate its size and weight, but the image quality is just plain awesome. And it has been optically corrected when it comes to distortion. I bet the new 23mm f2 is not. Even Fujifilm call their f2 lenses inferior to their f1.4 counterparts.

Edited by petergabriel
Link to post
Share on other sites
Nero Rising Star

Nero

Posted
Posted

The 35mm f/2 is a fine lens, but the 35mm f/1.4 has a unique magic to it. When in doubt, I always go for the optically corrected distortion versus digital correction. That's how they were able to make the 35mm f/2 cheaper and smaller. It may still be a great lens, but relying on software distortion correction will almost always produce lower image quality. Fuji deserves a pat on the back for making the f/2 come this close to the f/1.4, but there is a very noticeable difference to me. I am very interested to see how the 23mm f/2 stacks up to the f/1.4 version. The 23mm f/1.4 is another of my favorites, but it has a very "clinical" rendering compared to the 35mm, which makes me wonder if it might be possible for them to get the f/2 version a little closer to the f/1.4 than they were able to with the 35mm lenses. Relying on digital correction will still lose some sharpness in edges and corners, but there's a little less "magic" to try to recapture in the 23mm, it's mainly a matter of sharpness.

Link to post
Share on other sites
mdm Experienced

mdm

Posted
Posted

The 35mm f/2 is a fine lens, but the 35mm f/1.4 has a unique magic to it.

 

 Well ... I'm afraid the only way to find out how is this misterious Magic looks like, is to get old noisy 35f1.4 with some magic in it plus antique X-Pro1 as they say that it also has some magic in it plus ... not sure whether I need to put any magic spell upon this combo and visit some special place in time to be able to induce The Magic to reveal it's presence to me... :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sluw Community Regular

Sluw

Posted
Posted

 Well ... I'm afraid the only way to find out how is this misterious Magic looks like, is to get old noisy 35f1.4 with some magic in it plus antique X-Pro1 as they say that it also has some magic in it plus ... not sure whether I need to put any magic spell upon this combo and visit some special place in time to be able to induce The Magic to reveal it's presence to me... :D

You can call it magic or just larger aperture, optical corrected, smoother bokeh and a different color rendering. If you prefer the lens to be a bit smaller and WR you choose the f/2.0 if you prefer the things said before you choose the f/1.4. They can exist next to each other. Oh and since the firmware updates and faster focussing bodies the noise really is not too bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Nero Rising Star

Nero

Posted
Posted

 Well ... I'm afraid the only way to find out how is this misterious Magic looks like, is to get old noisy 35f1.4 with some magic in it plus antique X-Pro1 as they say that it also has some magic in it plus ... not sure whether I need to put any magic spell upon this combo and visit some special place in time to be able to induce The Magic to reveal it's presence to me... :D

When I say "magic" I'm saying that there are qualities to the lens that are a bit deeper than numbers and official test results. When Fuji first released the 35mm f/1.4, a lot of people were talking down its edge sharpness and other test results, but in the end it became one of the most loved lenses in the XF lineup. The images may not quite "measure up" to some others in official tests, but there is something very appealing to how it renders images that you cannot see in specs, charts, and diagrams. The f/2 is a great lens, but the images I get from it don't have that same quality. For me, it's worth owning, but unless I'm concerned about needing the WR feature on a particular day, the f/1.4 is what goes in my bag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Neil Rosenberg
      Infrared Photography on X-E2 665nm

      By Neil Rosenberg · Posted

      I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Tschortschli
      Screen is flipped with fan001

      By Tschortschli · Posted

      Hy there When Im using the fan001 on the XH2s and I flip the LCD Screen vertically by 180 degrees then the image flips vertically, what is good but it also flips horizontally. The clean feed on HDMI is not flipping horizontally but its also flipping if the HDMI output info display is on. When I unmount the fan then the image flips only vertically. My firmware is updated to the latest version. Any ideas if there is a fix for that?
    • Neil Rosenberg
      Infrared

      By Neil Rosenberg · Posted

      In reply to the original question, it all depends on what you mean by infrared.  If you mean "see thermal information", then I agree with the comments here.  However, if you mean near-infrared, the X-T4, or basically any digital camera can be modified to "see" it.  Check out Lifepixel.com and Kolarivision.com for more info. As regards lenses, I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Greybeard
      XS10 and manual lenses

      By Greybeard · Posted

      No - I don’t think so - it means you can take pictures if you remove the lens completely - but I’m not sure that is a problem
    • mcewena
      XS10 and manual lenses

      By mcewena · Posted

      I bought a manual lens over xmas and it took me a while to find the "shutter w/o lens" function in the menu settings.  So far I haven't found a way to either put that on the Q menu or marry that setting to one of the 4 custom modes.   Am I missing something? Is there a problem if I just leave that setting enabled even when the OEM auto lens is in place? tia
×
×
  • Create New...