Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Why would Sony launch a MF body ? They are barely stabilizing their lenses for the FF at the moment, releasing another format with new lens would be very counter productive.

 

Plus the sensor making department branched to become a company on its down, it is no longer tied to another business unit. So they can clearly produce MF sensors but not make any camera body/lenses for it.

 

[Edited as I said Fuji on first sentence instead of Sony, apologies for confusion >.<]

Edited by darknj
Link to post
Share on other sites

have we not been there already?

 

 

 

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/2122-medium-format-rumors/

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/1157-medium-format-fuji-tell-me-the-first-question-fujirumors-should-be-able-to-answer-for-you/

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/259-let’s-drop-the-rumor-bomb-fujifilm-is-forging-a-medium-format-camera-source-right-in-past/page-4

 

I too think that it might not be a wise move and that would end up confusing the market with yet another top model ( X-pro 2, X-T2 and Y-MF-1...or whatever they are going to call this)

 

Beside that MEDIUM format might be a two APS-C 24 MP... stitched together for all we know ( of you think it is impossible, well, I am not the first person to think this possible :) ) and a fixed lens camera ( like their old 6x 9 or 6 x4.5) wouldn’t necessarily open the market to a new completely different line of lenses....

 

But all of this has been discussed at length before.

 

Patrick seems to be “ in the know” and he says it will come, he owns a forum called “ Fuji Rumors” which qualifies him better than anyone else to make informed guesses.

 

We will know when we get there, or rather when Fuji releases the first camera that has “ escaped “ their control ...not a moment before

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point we can safely assume there will be one.

 

Whether it will be a success remains to be seen. Frankly speaking, unless they would offer this at a price that no one could refuse , I don’t think I will be in the market for one of those.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know why Sony would launch one.  I went Fuji over Sony due to their lens selection, I'm with darknj, it would be stupid for them to do it.

 

Fuji has been in the medium format business for decades, it's a natural progression for them to come out with one.

 

As far as success goes, it's all about setting their expectations for it and getting the structure right.  With anything like that it's about volume and margin, the trick with Fuji will be how quickly do they expect the MF side of their line to be profitable.  That'll allow them to set their margins for the volume they expect to turn out.  Hopefully they can have a decent enough margin to remain competitive to what's already on the market.

Edited by CRAusmus
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fujifilm's MF body would probably be in the $4.9k range. Again their MF lenses would probably be the reason. Not sure how the XTrans will perform but I suspect it will be good. Larger pixels, run cooler, better bit depth and DR, excellent sharpness and detail. It will be an eye opener at that price.

 

SONY as usual will wow with excellent resolution, detail, stupendous color and detail. A few excellent lenses but be prepared to pay......

 

Just saying.... :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

We all know that Medium Format is the last frontier in image quality, eventually it will be standard for every studio that can afford it.

If they could make a seamless quad APS-C sensor design it would probably cut a few thousand dollars off the price. It might even be cheaper than Full Frame at that point.

But really it would make more sense to use vertical slices for a sensor array, first off you don't want a seam at the very center, and secondly the smaller they make each sensor the cheaper it will be, and at least it sounds better to keep the chips symmetrical.

Alternatively, if BSI chips can be layed out in a grid without interfering with each other then you could panel as many tiny chips together as you could want, and it would be BSI, and then maybe they could make a "round" sensor that covers the whole image circle instead of forcing people into a given aspect ratio.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...