Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don’t do any flash photography ( aside the very occasional use of the built in strobe in the cameras as a rather close up fill in device) since I am using this camera.

 

In past years I used a number of brands of Studio Strobes on digital Canon cameras without any problem at all.

 

Now I would like to use a slide copying device with a strobe which might have high voltage triggering.

 

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used ebay flash triggers to wireless trigger old Nikon SB-80 speedlights using my X-T1..

These do not provide TTL but are inexpensive.  Mine are branded ishoot but that does not mean much ;-).

Similar model: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Universal-WANSEN-16-Channels-Wireless-Radio-Remote-Studio-Flash-Trigger-Receiver-/151973937364?hash=item23625a40d4:g:xKkAAOSwoydWtB4I

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for your help but I am afraid that I might have not made myself clear. I wasn’t talking of the physical possibility to use my cameras with manual flashes.

 

What I am talking about is using a flash ( in my case a light box)  with a trigger tension which might be damaging the camera. The unit in question, by the way doesn’t even have a hot shoe.

 

You must not be familiar with this phenomenon perhaps you better read about it before you do anything wrong.

 

http://dpanswers.com/content/genrc_flash_measuretv.php

 

This article starts  with” Some old flash units are known to have DANGEROUSLY high trigger voltages...."

 

There would be no problem if one could measure it and one would know what is safe for the Fuji circuitry.

 

Since I cannot measure the unit before buying I was  trying an alternative route.

 

Anyway other solutions above have already addressed the way to solve this problem.

 

Thanks anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest thiswayup

Thanks for your help but I am afraid that I might have not made myself clear. I wasn’t talking of the physical possibility to use my cameras with manual flashes.

 

What I am talking about is using a flash ( in my case a light box)  with a trigger tension which might be damaging the camera. The unit in question, by the way doesn’t even have a hot shoe.

 

You must not be familiar with this phenomenon perhaps you better read about it before you do anything wrong.

 

http://dpanswers.com/content/genrc_flash_measuretv.php

 

This article starts  with” Some old flash units are known to have DANGEROUSLY high trigger voltages...."

 

There would be no problem if one could measure it and one would know what is safe for the Fuji circuitry.

 

Since I cannot measure the unit before buying I was  trying an alternative route.

 

 

You can find trigger voltages for most popular older flash units online; very few go over the 300V that most Fuji X will take safely. Eg

 

http://dpanswers.com/roztr/volt_finder.php

 

Checking a trigger volatage is easy with a cheap multimeter

 

http://dpanswers.com/content/genrc_flash_measuretv.php

 

..If you're worried the voltage might be too high, then just buy from a seller with a return policy. But sanely, any device safe for digital cameras will be safe for something like a camera with a 300V trigger - that's a freakishly high figure for a digital camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Does this high voltage problem still remain if using a PC cord on my Fujifilm x pro 2? I have shoot about 5 frames with a PC cord on it with a Vivitar 283 flash made in Japan

 

Watch out for the older Viv 283 - I had one that put nearly 400v. One time I used it in a handle grip at an event and it put the voltage right through my face to the camera (Koni-Omega 6x7 RF). Bad PC cord. Crazy!

Edited by Max_Elmar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch out for the older Viv 283 - I had one that put nearly 400v. One time I used it in a handle grip at an event and it put the voltage right through my face to the camera (Koni-Omega 6x7 RF). Bad PC cord. Crazy!

 

Wow...must have been a shock.

 

The PC cord probably isn't properly insulated or they may be using materials with the wrong dielectric properties!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...