Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Prestige production without an economic return is a very luxurious undertaking for a  brand which makes most of its money in sectors that are not digital photography. 

 

IF your pension fund has invested in Fuji stock I am sure that they will demand the company to make money and not losing any, prestige or no prestige.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite the fact that all these arguments look quite convincing I'm  still sad. Is Fugi going to do something about it? ;)

Well, just because there is a rumor that the rumored 33 mm f/1 is off the development schedule does not mean it, or something like it, will never be produced.

 

The lens could be back on the roadmap a year from now as Fujifilm finishes off some of the other lens projects. What if Fujifilm decided to make a f/1 video lens between 30 mm and 40 mm? There is also a possibility the old 35 mm f/1.4 could be refreshed and enlarged to a f/1 to better separate it from the 35 f/2's market. The f/2 WR lenses have a lot of attraction for those who do not have the older lenses so Fujifilm is likely wondering whether to retire the sub-f/2 lenses or rework them sometime in the future into lenses without so much overlap in use. Adding WR, increasing focus speed, and bulking them up with larger elements must surely have been discussed internally because the f/2s cannibalize new sales of the previous generation.

 

Do not give up hope.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...