Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My wife and I did Thanksgiving dinner with her mom last night. Her mom lives in a small cottage-y town about an hour away from us. There was definitely some light pollution from the houses around us, but I could see the Milky Way from her backyard.

 

I'm pretty happy with the results (this is my second attempt at astro) but I really wish I had something wider. I need to get the 56mm for jobs, but as soon as I can afford it I'm getting the Rokinon 12mm. I had a blast doing this and just wish I could have gotten a wider field of view for pretty much every shot.

 

This was the 23mm at 1.4, and 15 seconds and 3200 IIRC.

 

22111705915_9d59b8c81b_c.jpgDSCF6024 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr

 
And here are a few more I shot in a more woodsy area of the town. In the car photo, I couldn't actually see the car or any lights on inside it when I was outside.
 
21935431330_7baa5caa4c_c.jpgDSCF6042 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr
 
22133716631_7633c11ea2_c.jpgDSCF6040 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr
 
22121766951_64d472a9f8_c.jpgDSCF6045 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They're all quite nice pictures, especially the third one, but they also remind me why I sold my 23mm. It's otherwise great lens, but coma is something quite horrible. Unfortunately same is true for 16mm F1.4. It's a shame that in order to do wide angle astrophotography you're pretty much forced to use Samyang manual focus lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And this doesn't look like coma, just a slow(er) shutter speed that allowed for slight movement (?)

This is definitely coma. Central stars are sharp. Edge stars look like comas around the center. That's quite usual uncorrected aberration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...