Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My wife and I did Thanksgiving dinner with her mom last night. Her mom lives in a small cottage-y town about an hour away from us. There was definitely some light pollution from the houses around us, but I could see the Milky Way from her backyard.

 

I'm pretty happy with the results (this is my second attempt at astro) but I really wish I had something wider. I need to get the 56mm for jobs, but as soon as I can afford it I'm getting the Rokinon 12mm. I had a blast doing this and just wish I could have gotten a wider field of view for pretty much every shot.

 

This was the 23mm at 1.4, and 15 seconds and 3200 IIRC.

 

22111705915_9d59b8c81b_c.jpgDSCF6024 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr

 
And here are a few more I shot in a more woodsy area of the town. In the car photo, I couldn't actually see the car or any lights on inside it when I was outside.
 
21935431330_7baa5caa4c_c.jpgDSCF6042 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr
 
22133716631_7633c11ea2_c.jpgDSCF6040 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr
 
22121766951_64d472a9f8_c.jpgDSCF6045 by Phil Babbey, on Flickr
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They're all quite nice pictures, especially the third one, but they also remind me why I sold my 23mm. It's otherwise great lens, but coma is something quite horrible. Unfortunately same is true for 16mm F1.4. It's a shame that in order to do wide angle astrophotography you're pretty much forced to use Samyang manual focus lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And this doesn't look like coma, just a slow(er) shutter speed that allowed for slight movement (?)

This is definitely coma. Central stars are sharp. Edge stars look like comas around the center. That's quite usual uncorrected aberration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...