Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am new to this forum and a recent 'convert' to the Fuji X system. I recently purchased a second-hand 10-24mm f/4.0 and while the lens is cosmetically okay and appears optically in good shape, I do have a concern about the OIS. I can see barely any difference between OIS "ON" and OIS "OFF" - both stills (at 1/2 sec) and video. I compared it with my 'kit' lens the 18-55 f/2.8-4.0 and the OIS on the newer 'kit' lens appears much more noticeable.

Is this a normal expectation of the 10-24mm? I am wondering whether to return the lens.

Any comments from the wise would be appreciated!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First of all, the shorter the focal length, the less noticable the impact of OIS. It’s easier to steady a shorter focal length by hand. In order to compare, you need to set both lenses at approx. the same focal length (e.g. 23mm) select an object at 2-3m distance (max.) and make shots with longer shutter speeds. Then you should see similar OIS impact. If not, you could have the 10-24 checked. If you’re a videographer, you could do similar and walk around. OIS should create a steadier motion with less shake. Note that some waivy background in video is ‘normal’ with some Fuji OIS lenses. In fact the new 10-24 MkII is worse in this than the older version.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Herco for your kind advice.

I have now compared the two lenses (10-24 mm vs 18-55 mm) at 24mm (because this is the narrowest field of view on the 10-24). This confirmed that there was nothing happening at all on the 10-24mm lens. It is strange because the camera body registers the OIS and there is the usual 'whirring' sound if one places the lens to the ear whilst the OIS is operational. Also, when the lens is not active (camera switched off or lens separated from the body), there is a slight rattle if one shakes the lens from side-to-side - this rattle disappears when the lens becomes active.

Your advice really helped - so now it's off to the local Fujifilm Service Centre (Australia) to sample their legendary customer service. I will post an update with the results.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

It is strange because the camera body registers the OIS and there is the usual 'whirring' sound if one places the lens to the ear whilst the OIS is operational. Also, when the lens is not active (camera switched off or lens separated from the body), there is a slight rattle if one shakes the lens from side-to-side - this rattle disappears when the lens becomes active.

The whirring is normal, it is the OIS working. You also hear it when the OIS switch is in the "OFF" position, it keeps the OIS group parked in a centered position. Maybe that is where your lens malfunctions, keeping it in the parked position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks mrPeter. I'm guessing that the lens does seem to be able to park the OIS group because the 'rattle' disappears when the lens is powered up.

Interesting there appears to be no information online about how these mechanisms can malfunction. Not that I would want to attempt a repair myself, but it is interesting to know what has gone wrong. Not sure whether Fujifilm Service will explain that though.... Anyway we'll see...

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're welcome PW104. I searched the internet looking for a document that would explain why the whirring does not stop when you switch the OIS "OFF". When I could not find such document I wrote an e-mail to Fuji service in Germany and they answered:

>>unfortunately there is no special articel about this behavior.

The OIS group is a free moving group. So when the camera gives power to the lens
this group gets first centered in position and is then stabilizing the image.
When you switch off the OIS function the motors of the OIS group fix the group in center
position. While keeping it in this position the motors are active and procude a
"working sound". 
 
When you have any further question, please feel free to contact us.<<
 
It shows they are very helpful when you have questions about your Fuji equipment.
 
Henk
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again mrPeter

As you mentioned in your earlier post - it seems that (apart from lack of image stabilization) the symptom of the fault is that the OIS lens group is remaining in the 'parked' position and therefore I guess the cause may be a lack of signal from the lateral vibration detectors to the OIS motors (when the OIS switch is in the 'ON' position. If this is the logical next cause then I think that is where my reasoning may have come to a stop and I'll have to wait for the Fuji service technician to take it further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I repeat - there is something wrong. I have the same lens and an x-t5 and do not experience any sharpness problems. It may be that there are problems with a 150-600 lens, I don't  know, but mjoseph67 is using the 16-55. Make sure the af is set to focus priority and that you do not have af with mf set (if you have you could be accidentally moving the focus ring after autofocus). If that doesn't help get your camera and lens checked out.
    • Perhaps matrix/evaluative metering mode would be a better choice in more circumstances. We need to be aware of how the camera will see the scene and choices it might make, I find having the viewfinder set to "exposure preview" or whatever it's called is helpful in knowing when to apply exposure compensation.
    • This is what I found on a firmware update that seems to address the problem. However, firmware version is at Ver. 211 already. As stated above this occurrence only happens using the EVF and at apertures between f2.0 and 3.6. It does not happen using the OVF or LCD. The firmware update Ver.2.11 from Ver.2.10 incorporates the following issue: The phenomenon is fixed that when pressing the shutter button halfway under certain conditions, the live view can flicker.
    • Hi! Thanks for this comment! Yes, although I'm utterly happy with my X-T50, small, light, sharp pictures, Xapp functioning, I've got to know that the camera tends to emphasize contrast in contrasty scenes. In a way this is strange to me, as X-T50 mostly exposes very well. This is especially expected with photos with foliage. Of course, I would like that the behaviour would be different. When I'm taking travel and such pictures I choose for JPG format (not HEIC, as Mac's Photos opens them oddly very slowly; iPhone's HEICs open fast ...). With JPG I've chosen to use the DR400 setting, but the problem is still there. For "more important" photos I of course use the RAW format. Regards, T.
    • Congrats on your Fuji! Since the receipt is in your relative’s name, they’re technically the original owner for warranty purposes. Some manufacturers, including Fuji UK, may allow a warranty transfer if you contact them and explain it was a gift. You could either ask your relative to make any initial claim, or reach out to Fuji to register it under your name as the recipient of a custom gift. Since it hasn’t been registered yet, it’s a good time to check with them.
×
×
  • Create New...