Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am torn between the XT-3 and the XT-30. 
I currently use an XE-2 and a pair of Nikon full frame cameras. 

The Fuji will be my hiking, snowshoeing and travel camera. I have watched far too many videos and read a lot of reviews and comparisons. Unfortunately none of the local shops have either camera in stock. So a special order will be necessary. One comment that I keep seeing is that the XT-30 is good for people with smaller hands. People with larger hands complain about pressing the Q button unintentionally, not having a place for all their fingers etc. That said, I have had no complaints about the XE-2, but I always use the accessory grip.  I would definitely get a grip for an XT-30. 

In perspective, I wear a size 11 (EU) glove (XL I think in the US).

Thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don' have very big hands. But they are not small (18 cm from the top of my middle finger to my wrist).

Sometimes I keep hitting the Q button by accident, but not very often.

The problem that I had with the x-t30 was that the grip bump on the right side of the camera is too small, and I didn't feel safe holding the camera with just one hand and the 18-55mm kit lenses. I bought a grip (not the fuji one, but a replacement that I found on amazon which was a third of the price), and now it feels ok.

In attached photos you can see the camera with the grip and without the grip and you will see what I mean.

Despite this ergonomic problems, the camera is amazing and I'm very happy with it.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I've tried these 2 cameras, then I found X-T30 is really not easy to hold, and according to my personal experience, my right thumb inadvertently click the "Q" button quite often when I operate it.
By the way, I have small hands and hurt arms, but I choose X-T3 & 18-55mm len, now I want to buy 10-24mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice.

 

I took the plunge and went for the X-T3. Very happy with the camera.

I have the 18-55 that I got with my XE-2 almost 6 years ago (hard to think) as well as 35, 18 and 55-200. I do want to get a wider angle lens and the 10-24 sounds like a 2020 purchase. 

For now I have to learn to deal with the fact the Photoshop CS6 can't process my RAW files without my adding a step to my workflow. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you would have been happy with either camera (with a lightweight handgrip) - if you are going out in snowy weather the X-T3 (with appropriate lens) is better weather sealed.

I solved the Q button problem on my X-T30 by using a grip that prevented an accidental press (and changing its function to AF-ON).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...