Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all. If you don't mind, I could use some advise here.

 

I shoot a lot of conferences (people speaking animatedly at podiums on stage) usually in bad lighting without the opportunity to use flash.

 

Given the lighting, I typically have no option but to shoot wide open at f1.2 or f1.4 in slow burst mode usually using single point focus as opposed to continuous as I've never had much success with continuous in the past and do not feel confident relying on that focus mode as it tracks too much before the shutter is released.

 

However, given such a narrow depth of field it doesn't take a genius to realise that if I am shooting in burst mode then only the first shot in a series is ever in focus as the people are moving ever so slightly back and forth at the podium.

 

So, I'd be interested to hear what others do/would do and how you set up your X-T1's for similar situations and also find out about your shooting techniques (e.g: do you rely on continuous focus, do you use zone focus, face detection, slow or fast burst mode, back button focus etc etc) to get a higher hit rate in focus in burst mode at such a shallow aperture?

 

I realise it is a totally different beast, but I come from a Nikon D4 which I used to set to continuous focus and always did a perfect job every time.

 

P.S. I have updated firmware to version 4.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Generally speaking, the X-T1 is not that great for moving subject, to an extend, if they are just walking, it should be good enough.

 

That being said, I assume you have the Face Detection feature disabled ? When it's off, it allows you to use the center points as Phase Detect AF, which is faster a bit more reliable.

 

Now, on your case, I would use on Continuous mode zone focus on Mechanical Shutter and use the large 5 x 3 zone so the tracking happens only in that area. It does a decent job on my 5 years old son that likes to hide from me when I try to take a piture of him. Of course not all shots are 100% accurate, I get about half of them good.

 

One question, you say you shoot at F1.2 or F1.4, I guess you are using the 56mm, is that correct ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 56mm is known to be a tad bit slow in AF, the 23mm should fare better.

 

Then again, since I do not own either lenses, I could be talking out of my butt, so any of the lenses owners can confirm or correct me on previous statement ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Continous Focus is fairly good also try using the Lower burst mode I find you get less shots but they are more accurate.

 

Turn shutter priority to Focus as opposed to release for both single AF and Continous (set as default to release)

 

This will slow down your burst but it means the camera prioritizes focus accuracy over shutter release.

 

Turn on High performance mode

 

Possibly Turn on Pre-AF (take more batteries)

 

 

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...