Jump to content

Adapting mamiya 645 Lenses to fuji x

Jarekv

By Jarekv
in Adapting lenses to Fuji X

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jarekv Newbie

Jarekv

Posted
Posted

Hello everyone,

I would like to ask if there is any way you know Of to adapt mamiya 645 lenses to fuji x mount. And by adapter i mean with glass elements (speedbooster), not a plain adapter just to fit another mount.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
tiggyboo Explorer

tiggyboo

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

<sorry, I see now this adaptor is for Sony - wasn’t able to figure out how to delete my post>

Is something like this what you are looking for? https://www.adorama.com/kabenexma645.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjwpPHoBRC3ARIsALfx-_J9AUFr19E-ozxexZkYqMnZZAvy1-1Kf8P4kixHtZOrzOXb8vbi9y4aAlUqEALw_wcB

Good luck,

Al

Edited by tiggyboo
Posted erroneous information
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 year later...
matsonfamily Apprentice

matsonfamily

Posted
Posted (edited)

I can't seem to find a combination of speedbooster + adapter, and definitely no speedbooster that does mamiya645->fujiX

EDIT:

There are 645 to EF and EF to X adapters... so you could do a double adapter to mount a 645, but making the medium format lens brighter on X doesn't seem to be possible.

Edited by matsonfamily
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
Glyndor Newbie

Glyndor

Posted
Posted

How about:

Fotodiox  Mamiya 645 (M645) Mount Lenses to Canon EOS (EF, EF-S) Mount SLR Cameras; infinity focus or beyond allowed

https://fotodioxpro.com/products/m645-eos-p

plus….

Lens Turbo II

https://zyoptics.net/product/lens-turbo-adapters-mark-ii-for-fuji-mount-camera/

I use a similar set up on my Fuji.  I bought a slightly different Fotodiox Mamiya adapter but to Pentax PK, cut off the PK and changed to M42 keeping the same flange focal distance (PK and M42 are equal distance).  From here I added a M42 to FD adapter so as to fit my FD to Fuji Metabones Speed Booster.  Going the EF route above would be easier but FD to Speed Booster is what I had. (Yes, infinity is OK).  I wanted to use the excellent Mamiya 645 C 80mm f2.8 on my Fuji.  Now it acts as a light weight 90mm f2 on Fuji using only the sweet centre of the lens even when boosted.  Additionally on a dumb adapter I get a 120mm f2.8.

Don.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • jerryy
      Fungus

      By jerryy · Posted

      A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • Don Barar
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By Don Barar · Posted

      The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • PoorAlchemist
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By PoorAlchemist · Posted

      I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Don Barar
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By Don Barar · Posted

      Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...