Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

 

I know this is predominantly for digital 'X' users, but a thought occurred to me that with the recent release of a brace of lens conversions for the x100 series Fuji could, technically at least, market a similar lens conversion system for the magnificent Fuji GF670 series of film cameras.

 

Would there be any appetite, or any reason why a 50mm equivalent conversion lens could not be made?

 

Cheers,

 

 

Jonathan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfectly possible but not much customer base and those who do still use this camera would be worried about image quality. If you are forked out for the quality of a GF670 and are still using it, you need the best image quality possible. Unlikely that anyone would trust a convertor even if Fuji could make a perfect one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfectly possible but not much customer base and those who do still use this camera would be worried about image quality. If you are forked out for the quality of a GF670 and are still using it, you need the best image quality possible. Unlikely that anyone would trust a convertor even if Fuji could make a perfect one.

Ah, good point, the MF negative size would maybe be more demanding than that of aps-c-sized camera sensors and make building a lens converter that much more difficult (and expemsive).

 

Cheers,

 

Jonathan

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do like the idea of lens conversion for the GF670, but like you said I would be concerned about the image quality dropping. I do love the huge high quality negs from mine.

 

On another note, nice to see some fellow film shooters on this forum! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...