Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I use my Xt-2 for underwater photography and its awsome. No problems with WB because I use strobs.

But when I want to do video, the White Bance is terrible. I tried with custom WB with my white plate that I always have with me, tried with Underwater WB and it still very blue. Can anybody help me. Someone with experience in underwater video. And I also dont know wich settings are better for underwater video.

I also have a must cheaper point and shoot panasonic camera and I have no problems with WB.

Its very strange

Thank you in advance.

Carlos

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

There is only three brands in the market, SUBAL, NAUTICAM and MEIKON (SEAFROGS). The first and second, aluminium, the 3rd polycarbonat.

The Aluminium cases with ports for the lens you have to spent at least around 3500 if you have already have the lens for their ports. The Seafrogs cost you around 400 euros. I have the seafrogs, its very nice, you have some restrictions on commands but its easy to resolve. You just have to pay atention to maintenance before each dive, exactly as the other ones.

And I bought that one because if I floodade I still have a lot of plafond to buy a new body comparing with the coste of SUBAL and NAUTICAM.

 

Here its a link of some photos.

Cheers

 

CArlos

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...