Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Off to Kruger NP on May/June of this year & wondering how Fuji gear -XT2 + 100-400 has performed for Fuji users compared with Canon fit long teles.

My dilemma is whether to buy the 100-400 for a Fuji only kit or go with 150-600 Sigma & 5DIII + XT2 + 18-55. I have read in many places that the 100-400 is not quite as good as the Canon set up which is why I have not taken the plunge on the Fuji lens before now.

Flying South African Airways so don't know how strict they are with carry on weights. In previous birding travels to Asia & Europe going over carry on weights has never been a problem. There is also an internal flight from Jo'berg to Nelspruit.

Edited by TonyB
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just in SA in dec/Jan...went to krueger...as well as a few days at private game reserves.  I brought my xt2 and the 100-400 w/1.4 tele.  I also had another fuji body with my 18-135.  While I can't comment on canon...the fuji system worked out well for me on safari.  I used the 100-400 most of the time but there were also numerous occasions I needed a shorter lens to capture closer action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just returned from two weeks spent in Africa:  Uganda to view the gorillas for two days and Serengetti and the crater for four more, an additional day in the parks outside the crater also.  

 

I brought the 18-55 but used the 100-400 85% of the time and marveled at the OIS function.  Used bean bag on the Land Cruiser, when needed more throw.  This lens is special and with proper use of ISO can be used in low light situations nicely.  Made big mistake of being on Manual focus ( unrealized)  for a day and missed half the shots until I corrected.  

 

Used the big battery grip which I think is essential for long days shooting and multiple shots on CH.  Bring plenty of batteries (7) and recharge at night.  I brought a battery power pack in case I was away from electricity for a night.  Shot JPEG and RAW in #1,#2.  

 

Highlight was a treed leopard that posed nicely for twenty minutes, but saw all the animals as the weather in January was superb.  Hope this helps.

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. Will bear in mind  your airline comments especially as I always book extra leg room. 6'6" does not easily fit into normal seating. Fortunately I'm an "athletic" build so width is not so much a problem. However I find seats give no head support being so low at the back-relatively speaking of course.

I have booked a 100-400 for the day for this coming Monday so will find a quiet reserve with plenty of birds and do a comparison.

If I had all Fuji gear I would take 2x XT2,100-400 & 18-55/55-200, Along for the ride 10-24 & 35 f1.4.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was in the Serengeti and the crater in dec. the lens did very well. my only recommendation is that you limit it to 380 mm - the only unsharp pics i have are between 380mm and 400 mm.

 

From what i understand, kruger has open vehicles so bean bags may not be much help. Ask your safari provider/camps for pictures of the vehicles, and you should get an idea of what you'll need.

 

Dust is a definite problem, so try and take 2 bodies - one with a shorter lens. I had a lioness walk right up to the vehicle and the 100-400 was just too long.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While at krueger...I did NOT use my beanbag once...I did not have any room as the "jeep" was pretty full.  Additionally dust was not an issue for me as i had 2 bodies with different lenses and when I wasn't shooting I had my lens facing down at the seat.  I did not have the grip...and doing mostly bursts I had no issues with running out of battery.  I brought like 8 batteries on the trip but honestly could easily have gotten away with 4.

Edited by ullmandds
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Have tried the 100-400 & am still undecided as to whether I purchase or not. As luggage weight is not a problem I may well take  Canon 5DIII & Sigma 150-600 & hire a  Fuji 100-400 for 2 weeks.. Cost will be about $220 & I will have all bases covered + back ups. Weight is still far far less than taking a 5D111, 1DIII,500 f4 & 100-400,16-35 & 24-70.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...