Jump to content

Recommended Adapted Lenses

TopDownDriver

By TopDownDriver
in Fuji GFX Lenses

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
ImagesWest Apprentice

ImagesWest

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have the Mamiya 645 80mm f2.8N, 120mm f4N Apo, 150mm f3.5N, 150mm f2.8 Apo, and the older 105-210mm f4.5 UD lenses, and all are remarkably good.

 

Here's a shot from the 80mm f2.8N, wide open, along with a crop from the centre of the first image:

 

1559138.jpg

 

1559143.jpg

Edited by ImagesWest
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 years later...
Izak Apprentice

Izak

Posted
Posted (edited)

I use more lenses, manual and AF

For AF adapter: Nikon-AF - Sigma ART: 135/1.8, 35/1.4  (24/1.4 is too much, angels withoughtdraw . not only )
STEELSRING Nikon F Lens to Fuji GFX Camera

KENKO MF  adapter
Contax: Schneder shift lens 28/2.8 ... becuase this is shift, is usable on medium format
Minolta: 58/1.2 -- WOW efect ;-))

Edited by Izak
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 weeks later...
Izak Apprentice

Izak

Posted
Posted

Minolta 58/1.2 - adapter K&F concept MD-GFX  -  GFX50R
full open 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Izak Apprentice

Izak

Posted
Posted

Sigma Art 135/1.8 - steelsring F/GFX AF smart adapter - GFX50R 
 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Izak Apprentice

Izak

Posted
Posted

Sigma Art 135/1.8 - steelsring F/GFX AF smart adapter - GFX50R  - 100% ZOOM

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 months later...
  • 1 year later...
KimC Apprentice

KimC

Posted
Posted

I have recently upgraded from the Pentax 645Z to the GFX100S. Still getting to know the camera but the Pentax 645 lenses seem to work very well with the GFX. They are stunning quality and very cheap for that quality, even more so if you get the early "A" manual focus versions rather than the later FA autofocus ones. In particular the 200mm and 300mm lenses are a very cost effective solution for a long lens and as you are effectively using the "sweet spot" from the middle of the image circle are perhaps a better alternative than the FF 35mm lenses. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • thelostkiwi
      Looking for Full Frame lenses to adapt to GFX

      By thelostkiwi · Posted

      I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Thank you. I will research it.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Trevor R
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By Trevor R · Posted

      Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • jerryy
      Image correction with GF20-35

      By jerryy · Posted

      Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...