Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'll be going on an Alaska Cruise with an X-T2 (recently acquired) and a Nikon D500. 

My thinking, since I had the lens already, the D500 will be my long lens kit with Tamron G2 versions of the 70-200 and 150-600.   The X-T2 will be for indoor shots, people photos, and landscape.  D500 when I need the reach.

 

I've been using the X-T2 with the 35mm 1.4 and the 18-55mm lens.  I think these 2 cameras are great together as I still find focusing on the D500 much faster (might be user error) so not looking to add additional reach on the Fuji just yet.  I actually like not having to switch lens and don't mind carrying 2 cameras.

 

So my gear will be:

Fuji 35mm

Fuji 18-55

Nikon 70-200

Nikon 150-600

 

I'm trying to decide if adding a 16mm or 23mm would be beneficial or will the 18-55 be good enough.  Buy the 16 or 23 and leave the 35 home?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 16 and 23 are basically covered by the 18-55 (granted the 16 is a fair bit wider and weather-sealed, if that could be a factor is Alaska).  How about the 14mm Fuji, offering a significantly different view and a reasonably fast aperture?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 16 and 23 are basically covered by the 18-55 (granted the 16 is a fair bit wider and weather-sealed, if that could be a factor is Alaska).  How about the 14mm Fuji, offering a significantly different view and a reasonably fast aperture?

Thanks,  never considered a 14mm.  I'll look at some review/images.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd take the 16 1.4   It's a pseudo-macro for all the tiny tundra flora, and a very, very nice wide lens.  I'm heading to Anchorage next March for the Iditarod and will be packing:

 

X-T1 and X-T2 bodies

18-55 (my don't leave home without it lens)

16 1.4

60mm 2.4 Macro

55-200 Zoom

35 1.4

12mm Zeiss.  

 

I'l most likely leave my 23 1.4 at home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...