Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I took these pictures with the Fuji X-T2. This issue only happened on these photos. I'm not sure what caused it. 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Brooklynboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,  banding due to the light frequency interfering with the electronic shutter.

 

Many forms of artificial light are not continuous but intermittent producing on-off light cycles with a certain speed.

 

The same happens also with television or cinema screens.

 

If you shoot at speed faster than the  frequency of the light source this will returns bands of light where the light is effectively off when you shot the picture.

 

In the olden days you could also check the shutter speed by counting the lines of the television screen (different in PAL or NTSC). I suspect that this light source was a LED. You can also observe bands of different color ( Green and Magenta) as the the light switches between on and off.

 

Shooting at a longer shutter  (1/30 to 1/15 )speed should take care of this.

 

 

Find here an article which will help you.

 

 

https://www.getdpi.com/forum/fuji/56729-fuji-x-electronic-shutter-test-banding.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it does,  read the article and not, 1/60 is not (always) long enough  depends on the light source.

 

There are differences between fluorescent tubes and led and tungsten.

 

Besides there is a difference in 50Hz. or 60Hz.  current between countries using different systems.

 

 

We’ve already spoken about this

 

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/836-how-can-you-avoid-banding-using-the-mechanical-shutter-under-fluorescent-lights/

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hmm, had not realised that it would be possible for banding to occur with a plane shutter. However, it seems to me that it would be a much rarer occurrence. Interesting, in that specific case the banding would be linked to the speed of the shutter as opposed to the shutter speed ^_^

Edited by Florian
Link to post
Share on other sites

and to the light source.

 

of course this doesn’t happen if the shutter speed is long enough. One very important reason to stop thinking that shooting at 1.2 with depth of field paper thin would be a very good idea in a lot of situations

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

TS, what shutter speed u use?

it depends on where u stay and what electricity frequency ur place uses

my place uses 50 Hz...so if my shutter speed can be divided by 50, my pic will be free of banding...for example, 1/50, 1/75, 1/100...etc

but if i use odd shutter speed that is not multiples of 50 like 1/60, 1/120...my pic will have bandings

Link to post
Share on other sites

TS, what shutter speed u use?

it depends on where u stay and what electricity frequency ur place uses

my place uses 50 Hz...so if my shutter speed can be divided by 50, my pic will be free of banding...for example, 1/50, 1/75, 1/100...etc

but if i use odd shutter speed that is not multiples of 50 like 1/60, 1/120...my pic will have bandings

 

That's a clever observation. 60hz where I live, though this banding problem isn't something I've encountered so far.

 

The shallow depth of field in the pictures, and overall lack of sharpness suggest a hand held camera at a relatively low shutter speed, probably with the lens close to full aperture. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Hello all. I have had my x100f for around 5 years and recently it developed some issue with the eye sensor and EVF. The first issue is the responsiveness to the eye sensor. I often shoot in a way where I focus and meter using the evf but then pull away and use the LCD to frame the image. The issue is the eye sensor sometimes doesn't detect I have pulled away for a few seconds and sometimes not at all. The only way for it to detect is to put my finger over the eye sensor and remove it. or point the sensor towards a direct light source (eg the sun). There is a very light scratch on the top of the two little square sensors but I would be surprised if this is causing the issue. The second issue I just noticed today that there is a tiny droplet/stain on image in the EVF . It's not visible in the OVF, nor the LCD or final images so it's not a huge deal, but it is ugly and a little distracting. Am I correct in thinking that perhaps some water/dust got into the EVF? Is it possible to remove the EVF housing and clean it to resolve either or both of these issues. Should I send it to fuji? any ideas what this may cost. I am based in Paris, France. Thanks for any help.
    • I know this is an old thread but the gimbal situation for Fujifilm cameras is terrible. It's that bad that I would not recommend people buying into the Fuji system if their man thing is shooting video on a gimbal. As a Fujifilm shooter since 2011, I feel bad having to say that, but here's why.... I'm a photographer that also shoots around six to ten videos per week, all on a gimbal. I've shot video on the X-T3, X-T4 and now the X-H2. I think it was around 2020 when I bought a Weebill S. All was good and I used that until the Weebill 2 came along. On the Weebill S, I can control exposure compensation by rotating the rear thumb dial, which is something I need to do to adjust exposure on the fly as it's a smooth transition (unlike aperture). The S also has a record button that works. But on the Weebill 2, there is no way to adjust the exposure compensation and the record button is extremely stiff and works intermittently. Sometimes you end up starting the video at what you think is the end of the shot. I persevered with the 2 for a few months and then gave up. I went back to the S, burned it out and then had to buy another S because there wasn't a single gimbal out there that could give me a record button that works and a EV comp. So it's 2025 and my second Weebill S is on its last legs and struggling to stay level (some of my clips look like they were filmed on the Titanic). I really don't want to buy a gimbal that was released at the start of this decade, but I can't find a single one from any manufacturer that will work. Fujifilm get blamed a lot for not opening up their system, but at the same time, if the Weebill S can still control my X-H2, then DJI, Feyutech, Zhiyun etc obviously can do it, but choose not to. Or maybe I just keep Fuji as my personal cameras, but switch to something else for work. I've wrote to various gimbal manufacturers, but their replies are useless. I can't be the only one with this problem, right? Rant over.
    • Try setting Dynamic Range to Auto. A difficult ,situation but auto DR often shows great improvements
    • Has anyone found or successfully adapted a walking pole as a monopod?? I’m off to Chile and need to keep kit small and light but expect high winds. X-pro2 user. Thanks 
    • thank you, I just bought this from a market place, the pictures from the store did not show that particular micro scratch. After asking this and showing the picture above to seller, he said that it is not micro scratch, instead it is micro dust from behind the lens..hmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...