Jump to content

GFX100S II - problems with new camera

RR_photo
 Share

Recommended Posts

RR_photo Rookie

RR_photo

Posted
Posted

Hello,

I have been using the new Fujifilm GFX 100s II firmware 1.01 for a few days now and have noticed strange behavior in saving some RAW files (I have attached examples). I would like to point out that I am an experienced photographer with 35 years of experience, and this is the first time in my career that I have seen such behavior (I previously used a digital Canon EOS 5DS R). 
The perspective has been recorded strangely in the attached photos.
Link to RAW (RAF) photos:


Please check and comment.

In addition, the same camera has problems downloading photos saved on the camera card to the computer via the FUJIFILM X Acquire v. 1.29.0.1 application in the Windows 10 Professional environment.

After correctly connecting the camera to the computer via the original USB cable included with the camera (according to the camera instructions), the application does not allow downloading photos. The only thing the FUJIFILM X Acquire application allows you to do is save and restore the GFX 100S II camera settings.
I have tried all possible camera settings.
I would like to point out that the camera is visible through Windows 10 Pro in the USB settings and allows you to download photos, but only through the "Windows Photos" application.
Additionally, the FUJIFILM X RAW STUDIO v. 1.24.0 application works correctly.

Please help.

Regards
Ralf
Link to post
Share on other sites
RR_photo Rookie

RR_photo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Greybeard said:

Thats bizarre - its not just RAW though is it - at least one of the jpgs are also showing strange behaviour.

You might try turning off IBIS although that is clutching at straws.

Sure. A camera that has 102 MP without IBIS? That's more of a trash can camera, not one to use, especially without a tripod.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Greybeard Experienced

Greybeard

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, RR_photo said:

Sure. A camera that has 102 MP without IBIS? That's more of a trash can camera, not one to use, especially without a tripod.

Agreed - although in looking for a solution I would go through the functions that could result in movement - especially image #147 - which could be due to electronic shutter but it looks as though the camera would have been rotated while the image was taken

Link to post
Share on other sites
Leoko Newbie

Leoko

Posted
Posted
On 8/12/2024 at 4:12 PM, RR_photo said:

Hello,

I have been using the new Fujifilm GFX 100s II firmware 1.01 for a few days now and have noticed strange behavior in saving some RAW files (I have attached examples).

You are using a camera with pretty big sensor and a lot of MP. This sensor have a big readout time so you need to hold the camera still and shoot static scenes to use the electronic shutter, otherwise you will get a rollingshatter effect (just this effect in your pictures).

Try to switch to mechanical shutter to be sure that this effect will not be repeated at a crucial moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Don Barar
      LUT doesn't works on resolve

      By Don Barar · Posted

      Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • George_P
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By George_P · Posted

      I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • crazyfields
      Please save me from insanity 23mm f2 vs F1.4r

      By crazyfields · Posted

      First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • DavidJohn
      Unmarked government installation

      By DavidJohn · Posted

      I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...