Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

As a newcomer here and a future Fuji owner, I would like to know what you think about the recent debate concerning the camera JPEG color rendition.

 

Do you think that camera JPEG color rendition evolved from the X-Pro 1 to nowadays?

If so, do you think that this evolution is a regression? Is it any kind of "loss of magic" in X-Trans III cameras?

 

I wonder, because of that, If I should take the X-T10 or the X-T20 (I don't have enouth time to post-process and now want to shoot JPEG only).

 

Thank you by advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't speak to the evolutionary question, but one reason I bought the X-T10 is the JPEG renditions of the various film simulations. It should be noted, though, that you can't get a "straight" JPEG -- there's always some film simulation applied, even if it's the default Provia. For people who want "accurate" rather than "pleasing" images, that disqualifies the Fujifilm JPEGs.

 

As to the X-T20, I don't know of any rumors of such a model, and I'm not convinced there will be one at all. The X-T10 was a step-child of the X-Trans II family, produced in Thailand instead of Japan. And it caused significant confusion to buyers, who had to try to decide between the X-T1 and X-T10. I'm not sure that Fujifilm wants to get into that again. But you never know what Fujifilm will do. On the other hand, whatever they do, you can count on it showing up on FujiRumors at least a couple of months before any announcement, which will probably be another couple of months before availability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello Hermann, personaly I don't understand all this "magic" business. I just love Fuji X much more than other photo-ecosystems. Love it's colors sim., handling, IQ, love it's look. What about color rendition evolving... well yes, it might vary from sensor to sensor, but not to that extend to scary me.

Edited by mdm
Link to post
Share on other sites

The magic probably comes from people being stuck in a rut for years with their big cameras that they barely use, only to then discover a camera system they can literally take everywhere. You hear it all the time in the arguments for the 35 1.4 too. I think colour rendition between lenses and cameras with Fuji is very controlled, only minor differences in warmth in general. My old batch of Canon L's was all over the place when it came to colour rendition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • More testing of lenses today.  Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 IF ED VR (same applies to VR II) - dreadful. Heavy vignette at all focal lengths and apertures. Obvioulsy fine in 35mm mode.  Nikon 70-200 f/4 - some vignetting at full frame (similar to 24mm f/1.8 and Sigma 105 f/2.8 so probably correctable or slight crop to 80-90MP). Perfect in 35mm mode.  If weight is an issue for you the kit 35-70 Fuji GFX lens is lightweight and better than you might expect but isn't a fast lens at f/4.5-5.6 
    • Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
×
×
  • Create New...