Don't we need a mid-tele Zoom for travelling?

[MaurizioS]

Hi everybody, I have recently acquired a GF 100S, and love it! I have at this time a  GF 32-64 mm and several Pentax 645 lenses which are still very good but necessitate of an adapter (~10 oz.) and are obviously manual focus. The only GF tele zoom is the 100-200 mm at 2.2 lbs and there is a big gap from 64 mm. I currently use the 80-160 Pentax 645, but it is almost 3 lbs and 9 inches long with the adapter. The GF 45-100 is too short on the tele side, overlaps too much and it's heavy.

Shouldn't Fuji give us a 75-150 mm short, light for travelling that perfectly complements the 32-64 or the 35-70 mm that many of us have?

What do you think?