Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is nothing special or beyond ordinary about that setting. This is a static scene — the same as a still art setup, so pretty much any settings for the lighting that pleases you can work for the scene, keeping in mind the birds sitting on branches usually turn into birds in flight very quickly.

You can try f11, ss 1/250, and ISO as appropriate for the lighting. That should give you enough depth of field for most small to medium sized birds with any motion stopped enough to avoid blurring. These settings should work for larger birds as well if your focus point is on their eyes/head. Using single shot mode or continuous mode is up to you.

If you want really shallow DOF — for good background blurring, adjust the f-stop down to f4.5 or lower and drop the ISO a bit to compensate.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, jerryy said:

There is nothing special or beyond ordinary about that setting. This is a static scene — the same as a still art setup, so pretty much any settings for the lighting that pleases you can work for the scene, keeping in mind the birds sitting on branches usually turn into birds in flight very quickly.

You can try f11, ss 1/250, and ISO as appropriate for the lighting. That should give you enough depth of field for most small to medium sized birds with any motion stopped enough to avoid blurring. These settings should work for larger birds as well if your focus point is on their eyes/head. Using single shot mode or continuous mode is up to you.

If you want really shallow DOF — for good background blurring, adjust the f-stop down to f4.5 or lower and drop the ISO a bit to compensate.

Thank you, for your answer, but shutter speed at 1/250 handheld is too low. I use at least 1/1250 .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you tell us where you are trying to take the shots, backyard tree, woody-tree region, deep forest, etc.?

It sounds like you might need a tripod. Usually, a shutter speed of 1 / the lens’ focal length is fast enough for a shot. But for lens with focal lengths over 400mm, a tripod tends to work better than handholding. Obviously a tripod does not always fit into what you are doing, but ….

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...