Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guys,

 

I have a Fuji 56mm 1.2 and a Fuji 35mm 1.4 (not in warranty anymore) whose aperture rings, after being perfectly fine for the better part of a year, suddenly don not function normally, in that they are getting more and more difficult to turn. They are tighter than before, but they are not uniformly tighter, if that makes sense - at some points its easier to turn them, at some points it is more difficult, almost impossible.

 

We have a Fujifilm authorised repairer in Romania, where I'm from, but they don't do lenses - the repairer there told me that he thinks dust might have gotten under the aperture ring - unlikely, I have a number of Fuji lenses and it's never happened to me, and I've never taken them to, say, the beach, where sand could have gotten in - but they can't work on them, they have to send them to Germany and recommended I do it myself.

Questions:

 

1. Anyone ever encountered this phenomenon?

2. Any ideas re a good repairer in Europe to whom I could send them for repairs and who could send them back to me? I'm looking for an authorised Fuji service, as a first preferance, but any good repairer would do.

3. Any other ideas?

 

Thanks for your time, 

 

Jordan

Link to post
Share on other sites

there are a number of problems reported with aperture rings slipping, not engaging or being stuck.

 

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/2823-aperture-ring-not-working-on-xf55-200mm/

 

http://www.fuji-x-forum.com/topic/680-56mm-f12-aperture-stopped-clicking/

 

I don’t think that it is a good idea to bring any lens to a third party for repairing ( Fujifilm authorized independent labs, really?) 

 

THIS is the page where they state their Romanian importer, get in touch with them, the emails you have to change the at for @ and (dot) for .

 

https://www.fujifilm.eu/eu/about-us/european-gateway/romania

 

24A Barbu Delavrancea Street, 6th apt, 1st district, Bucharest, Romania, postal code 011352

 

 

+40 21 314 79 11

 

 

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...