Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I recently bought an 'as new' XPro3 and all works perfectly but was looking up another topic today and saw a few rants about reliability that surprised me. Having had an XPro1 since it launched and still using to this day without any issues I was expecting to be still using the XPro3 for years to come in the same way. My XPro cameras are for personal work, I have an XT3 for my day to day studio work so they don't get the same heavy use but still the XPro3 is not that old so surprising to see them failing so soon. Is it a bad batch maybe or is it widespread? I've not seen a viral level of complaints but interested to know how other users have found their XP3 after a number of years use? I personally love it, not on an XPro1 level but I still love it all the same so hoping it will last!

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BrianRolfePhoto said:

I recently bought an 'as new' XPro3 and all works perfectly but was looking up another topic today and saw a few rants about reliability that surprised me. Having had an XPro1 since it launched and still using to this day without any issues I was expecting to be still using the XPro3 for years to come in the same way. My XPro cameras are for personal work, I have an XT3 for my day to day studio work so they don't get the same heavy use but still the XPro3 is not that old so surprising to see them failing so soon. Is it a bad batch maybe or is it widespread? I've not seen a viral level of complaints but interested to know how other users have found their XP3 after a number of years use? I personally love it, not on an XPro1 level but I still love it all the same so hoping it will last!

Hello, owned a xpro2 for a couple of years w/o any trouble at all before I hopped to Xpro3 and then to xt5 in the last 18 months…. actually I sold the xpro3 after 2 necessary repairs in a row: shutter button and display defect/kaputt/not working. Fuji fixed both cases for free even when warranty had expired…. Now, I own the XT5, which returned from repair yesterday: flickering and dead display. Repair was done during warranty period… next repair: need to reconsider Fuji.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Uncle Pete said:

Hello, owned a xpro2 for a couple of years w/o any trouble at all before I hopped to Xpro3 and then to xt5 in the last 18 months…. actually I sold the xpro3 after 2 necessary repairs in a row: shutter button and display defect/kaputt/not working. Fuji fixed both cases for free even when warranty had expired…. Now, I own the XT5, which returned from repair yesterday: flickering and dead display. Repair was done during warranty period… next repair: need to reconsider Fuji.

Sad to hear that and a little concerning. My first generation Fujis are still going strong and I still use them today. Guess I will see how the XPro3 goes but if it does fail I may well just stick with my old ones, they still produce beautiful files.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had mine for two years now (it's a three year-old camera, I bought it second hand) and the sub monitor has stopped working in the last few weeks. The LCD will probably go soon, if the stories are to be believed. As a photographer it doesn't bother me (i didn't buy the camera for the LCD, I'm an OVF shooter) but it does in terms of my ability to sell it on. I can't afford new Fuji camera's (only new camera I ever bought was the X10), I trade up. This one, I cannot sell so while I love it to bits, I'm stuck with it. For such a premium model you'd think this (the LCD going) should not be an issue but somewhere along the line Fuji dropped the ball and making you pay for repairs when it's clearly a design fault exacerbated by normal every day reasonable use is very disappointing. 

I'm still happy with the output though, it's a glorious camera and easily thr favourite of all the Fuji camera's I've ever owned. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...