Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi 

I take a series of photos on my XT-4 or XT-3 using the BKT function. Editing in PhotoShop (stacking), unfortunately, often blurry areas appear in the resulting photo. Is it a PhotoShop problem, lack of Fuji plugs or a problem of BKT settings in XT-3 / XT-4 series cameras. I used KIT 18-55 lens or Macro 80mm lens? Below are the BKT function settings in my XT-4 and a sample stacking photo.

 

Samples are here in my google clouds disk: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1hKmuaOZGjJxtKQn8Sspl96JRaHaAWqW1?usp=sharing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have samples from the original images used in the stacking? If you post those, it will be easier to see where / when the issues pop up.

Maybe post the problem section from one image and from the images used to make the stacked final image.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jerryy said:

Do you have samples from the original images used in the stacking? If you post those, it will be easier to see where / when the issues pop up.

Maybe post the problem section from one image and from the images used to make the stacked final image.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bG7Dol1KkuPedE2dvibi5iMY5p_Vw0Hi?usp=sharing orginal frame put this catalog (setting frame 70 step 10 interval 0 sek. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I downloaded folder one and ran it through Affinty Photo's Focus Merge -- their name for their version of automated focus stacking and using the very basic instructions found here:

https://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-focus-stack-in-affinity-photo/

I came up with this:

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Other than doing that and resizing it for uploading here, I did no editing such as exposure changes etc.

From what I can see, the files are okay, though a couple of them are very soft in all regions, so if you toss those out before trying to stack, you may have better results. -- Using blurry photos in stacking, results in blurry final images. Essentially just use images that have a region in focus.

(Note: I used Affinity Photo version 1, and of course Serif released version 2 today, so folks will have to get that one now as version 1 is apparently no longer for sale.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the author is saying in that article a couple of things, use good files from the start and secondly, these automated processes are not completely foolproof, sometimes the result is not perfect and you just need to be able to fix the problem spots.

Quite possibly, Lightroom has a way to allow you to fix any problems you encounter similar to how Affinity Photo give you the option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, jerryy said:

I think the author is saying in that article a couple of things, use good files from the start and secondly, these automated processes are not completely foolproof, sometimes the result is not perfect and you just need to be able to fix the problem spots.

Quite possibly, Lightroom has a way to allow you to fix any problems you encounter similar to how Affinity Photo give you the option.

Use auto stack in Fuji xt4 and delete out of fokus frame. 

Orginal photos is here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bG7Dol1KkuPedE2dvibi5iMY5p_Vw0Hi

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found several tutorials like these

https://www.photoshopessentials.com/photo-editing/focus-stack-images-photoshop/

https://photoshopcafe.com/focus-stacking-photoshop-tutorial/

which give you a more step by step approach. These create layer masks for each file being used — this approach is still mostly automatic, but you have more control over everything. Because you have access to the layer masks, you can use the usual edit masks stuff to get rid of any bad areas.

p.s. Your files are fine, once the merging is nailed down your final images should also be fine.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, jerryy said:

I found several tutorials like these

https://www.photoshopessentials.com/photo-editing/focus-stack-images-photoshop/

https://photoshopcafe.com/focus-stacking-photoshop-tutorial/

which give you a more step by step approach. These create layer masks for each file being used — this approach is still mostly automatic, but you have more control over everything. Because you have access to the layer masks, you can use the usual edit masks stuff to get rid of any bad areas.

p.s. Your files are fine, once the merging is nailed down your final images should also be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, now you can edit the layers’ mask to fix the bad areas. Here is a quick reminder of how to do that.

https://helpx.adobe.com/in/photoshop/using/editing-layer-masks.html

In essence, you find the layer that has the stuff you want to keep and paint that layer’s mask white — only in those areas you want to keep —- and make sure the layers above that one have their layer masks painted black in those bad areas to let the correct lower layer to show the fixed part.

This part is basic layer masking and editing. You may need to refer to some tutorials to help you along.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jerryy said:

Okay, now you can edit the layers’ mask to fix the bad areas. Here is a quick reminder of how to do that.

https://helpx.adobe.com/in/photoshop/using/editing-layer-masks.html

In essence, you find the layer that has the stuff you want to keep and paint that layer’s mask white — only in those areas you want to keep —- and make sure the layers above that one have their layer masks painted black in those bad areas to let the correct lower layer to show the fixed part.

This part is basic layer masking and editing. You may need to refer to some tutorials to help you along.

I don't know how to edit the masks 

Do you have a simple video tutorial on it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, XTymonFX said:

I don't know how to edit the masks 

Do you have a simple video tutorial on it?

Give the instructions in that link a try and see how they work for you.

I have some confidence you can get it working, after all, you have the ability to record, edit and post a video listing your efforts so far, that is far more difficult than clicking on a layer mask and painting in an area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...