Jump to content

Recording 4K with Remote app - won't work? Big problem...


Recommended Posts

Hi...

I have X-T30 II...

I try to record 4K video with Remote app on my iPhone, but it seems it always record just HD... That's a big deal... Any resolutions? Also focust point square don't work on iPhone screen when I shoot in video mode...

Thanx...

Marko

Edited by Marko1976
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Marko1976 changed the title to Recording 4K with Remote app - won't work? Big problem...

Oh yes, that's bad... I saw also the same issue debated here:

 

That man have good videos... Anyway, I am a huge fan of Fujifilm for years now... I mostly record myself, so using remote app would be great option I thought... Big deal breaker. How is that even possible for such a great brand, 4K is not supported to shoot with app? Isn't it just like, why it isn't possible? Isn't it just like, just a remote thing to press start to start shooting, I can't see why it isn't possible... Maybe we can contact Fuji to update the app?

 

Also focus control inside app is problematic - there is no control at all.

 

For now, I switch to my smart TV as a monitor for shooting via HDMI cable.... Anyway, It is good, but it could be better to have the controls in front of me via app...

Edited by Marko1976
Link to post
Share on other sites

It does seem like there should be a simple way to do this, but it will take some serious wifi equipment upgrades to do that, at least so I believe. Here goes:

First part:

The wifi chip in the cameras support the b / g / n standards so it theoretically can send / receive data at up to 100 Mbps. In real world conditions, that will be considerably slower -- just like a home wifi router.

The 4K Video Data Rate the camera supports is up to 400 Mbps which is already larger than the fastest possible wifi transfer speed. The lowest 4K Video Data Rate is 100 Mbps which might be feasible for transfer in ideal situations, but in practice, as noted, those ideal situations happen very seldom.

Second part;

So why not record 4K video to the card and send over 1080p video to the phone? This also seems like it should work. As an idea, sure, but in practice that is tricky. Think about converting some 4k video down to 1080p video on your computer. Most home desktop computers can do this, but it takes a while, even high end systems struggle when asked to do the conversions in real time, you need serious computing power to do the conversion on the fly, so to speak. That power is way beyond what is in the camera -- you would also need some serious cooling capabilities built in to handle the heat that comes rolling off of the chips while they are doing the task. This moves you up into the RED camera class -- very expensive.

So i think the 1080p transfer to the smart phones, etc. is the best current option out there.

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

That sound reasonable...

But I came from a different starting point. I would just need a control so that when I put myself in the scene and am far from the camera, I could adjust the focus from a distance of a few meters and press start...

So to speak - really just a remote control in the literal sense...

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Marko1976 said:

That sound reasonable...

But I came from a different starting point. I would just need a control so that when I put myself in the scene and am far from the camera, I could adjust the focus from a distance of a few meters and press start...

So to speak - really just a remote control in the literal sense...

Will this work?

https://camranger.com

https://www.dronenerds.com/products/gimbals/dji-rs-2-series/dji-ronin-raveneye-image-transmission-system.html

 

Edited by jerryy
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
On 8/21/2022 at 11:20 PM, jerryy said:

It does seem like there should be a simple way to do this, but it will take some serious wifi equipment upgrades to do that, at least so I believe. Here goes:

First part:

The wifi chip in the cameras support the b / g / n standards so it theoretically can send / receive data at up to 100 Mbps. In real world conditions, that will be considerably slower -- just like a home wifi router.

The 4K Video Data Rate the camera supports is up to 400 Mbps which is already larger than the fastest possible wifi transfer speed. The lowest 4K Video Data Rate is 100 Mbps which might be feasible for transfer in ideal situations, but in practice, as noted, those ideal situations happen very seldom.

Second part;

So why not record 4K video to the card and send over 1080p video to the phone? This also seems like it should work. As an idea, sure, but in practice that is tricky. Think about converting some 4k video down to 1080p video on your computer. Most home desktop computers can do this, but it takes a while, even high end systems struggle when asked to do the conversions in real time, you need serious computing power to do the conversion on the fly, so to speak. That power is way beyond what is in the camera -- you would also need some serious cooling capabilities built in to handle the heat that comes rolling off of the chips while they are doing the task. This moves you up into the RED camera class -- very expensive.

So i think the 1080p transfer to the smart phones, etc. is the best current option out there.

I think this is unacceptable. Sony has been doing this effortlessly in years considering they also have a very bad reputation on their software. 

Edited by eldricarpi
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, eldricarpi said:

I think this is unacceptable. Sony has been doing this effortlessly in years considering they also have a very bad reputation on their software. 

Perhaps you can show us an example or two where Sony's cameras have been transferring very high bit rate 4k data over b / g / n WiFi networks in real time to smartphone and tablets.

p.s. Welcome to the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...