Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Honestly, I don't think they are going to invest into that part of the market anymore, the current APS-C X series is doing quite well and Fuji is holding a nice deal of the market at the moment with their cameras.

 

Also, for the price of the bridge X-S1 at release, you can now get an X-T10 with a nice kit lens that will serve you well for years. 

 

True, we have nothing of the size that has that much reach as the X-S1 but the IQ is going to be much better at shorter range.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect the next viable release will be the XT-2, there is an ever growing band of Pro photogs who now use Fuji and that includes motor racing / general sports shooters.

 

The 100 - 400 has added another dimension to this capability and the current AFC / tracking just needs some minor tweaking to make it even better.

 

We know the new sensor in the X-Pro2 can deliver stunning IQ and some have openly proclaimed it to be able to deliver images as large and detailed as full frame cameras.

 

It's a case of wait and see - I am personally so pleased with the improvements in my X-Pro2 over the X-Pro1 that if the new XT-2 can match / exceed these I may consider trading my full frame kit in for an XT-2 + 100-400!

Link to post
Share on other sites

[...] AFC / tracking just needs some minor tweaking to make it even better.[..]

 

 

The AF tracking needs a lot more than just minor adjustments, I took the X-T1 birding last month and well, let just say that even my old D5000 would have done an equally well job...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Good Evening, the far end is important to me, I am an XS1 fan, paid about a 1000 pounds for it, when the HS50EXR came out compared them both and there was little difference difference in the result, one had a bigger sensor, the other a longer lens, did not check out S1,

got the XA1 with a XC 230 lens and that was clearly better,

now with the XPRO1 and looking to the 100 - 400 waiting for me I expect a great difference,

truth is if Fuji brought out a game changer replacement for the XS1, ie the ability to bring small birds close on Safari and be able to crop in,as well as take good landscapes i might buy it, it would save taking two cameras round the world, I have not checked the sony out, it has a 1in sensor which makes it a straight competition for an XS2 - will they make it - or duck out of the market? 

 

chasing the IQ is not everything!

its also the moment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your soul will not be imperiled if you add a superzoom bridge camera of another brand. There is no hardware relationship at all with my X-Pro1. It is a specialized piece of photographic equipment that opens whole new realms of exploration.

 

Having noticed that a 2000mm f/11Nikon mirror lens sold for $95,000 and B&H has a 1250mm f/5.6 for sale used at $180,000, the idea of a Coolpix P900 with an 83× zoom with a 35mm FOV of 24-2000mm made me whip out my plastic. Low expectations were greatly exceeded. Awesome image stabilization allows hand-holding at the maximum magnification. Necessarily a tiny sensor but one can clearly see bird's feathers at 2kmm. For traveling, every image is geotagged. The GPS is quick in locating enough birds for a positive location. (Should be installed in every camera.) Fully WIFi enabled as well. Fun to use. It extends my range of capabilities without infringing even slightly on my X-cameras.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your soul will not be imperiled if you add a superzoom bridge camera of another brand. There is no hardware relationship at all with my X-Pro1.

[...]

the idea of a Coolpix P900 with an 83× zoom with a 35mm FOV of 24-2000mm made me whip out my plastic. [...]

 

The Nikon P900 is a very impressive piece of gear, if someone has to get a a bridge camera that's definitely the one I am advising, it's rather cheap, very good IQ for the size and the ability to zoom into the moon makes it really impressive.

The camera stabilisation works really well.

 

But one needs to understand the camera to use it correctly, if someone just buys it and expect super sharp image at full electronic zoom range, they are going to face quite a let down, same goes for the AF speed, it's really not the faster among all the bridges bodies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, a superzoom needs a small-ish sensor and the optics would be unique to the body, unless Fujifilm designed a sensor to be the same size as their old super-zoom lens.

 

I could envision a case where the sensor and superzoom lens were standardized and given periodic updates but design re-use should be a mandate.

 

What might be really interesting is if a superzoom lens and body were separate. That is, a half-inch sensor body and short line of small xf lenses, including a superzoom.

 

This way, bodies and lenses could be updated independently.

 

It will not be too many years before APS-C sensors are way larger than necessary for professional photographers. Fujifilm might as well get a jump on a way to keep pro's from cell phones and P&S.

Edited by bhu
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...