Jump to content

Does anyone know why Aki-Asahi Camera Coverings is not updating Fuji covers?


Recommended Posts

I have a question for the “ cognoscenti “.

 

Why in Aki-Asahi Camera Coverings not updating Fuji covers?

 

 

http://www.aki-asahi.com/store/

 

 

They started well but at some point stopped updating their production and they Have not produced any update for Fuji camera more than a year despite Fuji having produced many cameras ever since.

 

I like to buy a skin for my cameras when the guarantee expires installing one voids automatically the guarantee which seems a bit unfair and drastic to me especially if you think that Fuji UK was producing customized models but they appear to no longer do that!

 

Why?

 

Well, their ( Fuji UK custom shop) website seems to be down for maintenance could it be  that they are going to surprise us soon?

 

 

“...We'll be back soon

The Fujifilm Shop is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance. We hope to be back on the 15th of February 2016. For any questions please email: contact.shop@fuji.co.uk...."

 

 

Meanwhile we can watch these tutorials by Aki-Asahi

 

 

 

 

 

 

I am particularly

attracted to these finishes for my black X-E2

 

002.jpg

 

002.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

That is indeed one of my question to them and, in fact, the whole point of this thread.

 

Why haven’t they updated any of the Fuji models past the Fuji X-E2?

 

There must be a reason. I don’t know whether they will share this reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe because there wasn't a big market for it ? The  X-E series sold very well in some asian countries like Thailand, where a lot of the younger and trendy ppl where using it. It was rather difficult not to see one of them every now and then.

 

The X-T1 is still kind of pro level camera, you really need to know what you are doing to fully operate it, if you aren't willing to spend the time to learn photography, the simpler, and still very good, X-E1/2 fits the bill very correctly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the numbers of people who own a X-T1 ( and many of us have already declared themselves to be in the market for an upgrade,  must have an itchy wallet, because they can’t wait for the X-T2 to come out) it should be an interesting market too, yet, nothing there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, but the forum user is already quite a step away from the generic "point and shoot" users. Plus, we both have acquaintances that are either somewhat knowledgeable about photography or get influenced by our experiences.

 

Even my son can tell when a shot is slightly out of focus because he watches me deal with it on semi regular basis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The general public doesn't go to camera shops to buy their cameras, they are usually get them in malls or places like MediaMarkt.

 

I was in a small imaging event a couple of weeks ago in Brussels, I was at the Fuji booth to give the X-Pro2 a try and a lady walked over asking about the zoom capabilities of the X100T, the Fuji representative tried his best to explain it was a fixed lens, thus no zooming.

That lady was baffled at the idea of having a small camera that does not zoom. 

 

As laughable it is for us, for her, the whole concept of fixed lens is just incredibly stupid and she couldn't understand why ppl were buying that camera and that it was even the third generation of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I got an email from the company ( it was unsigned so I am not sure who was the sender I suppose it would have been Mr. Asahi himself )

 

“..

Thanks for your inquiry.

I tried to make TX1 coverings but the body is not flat, I gave up. my 
apologies for this inconvenience.

I will see Xpro2..."

 

 

So the “problem” is the shape of the camera not being flat.

 

I am not so sure of what that exactly means, by holding my X-T1 and the X-E2 that I own I don’t notice one not being “ flat” over the other. I do notice that the X-T1 is very complicated, yes, for the detail observed above about the rear part of the camera being almost completely covered with some rubber thumb-rest, but most complication comes from the front which has many parts which would have to be a cut out into a very flimsy surface.

 

Nevertheless Mr. Asahi comment on the X-T1 not being “ flat” could have something to do with the reason why some of the skins on some of the X-T1 cameras are failing?

 

Who knows?

 

I have tried to launch the idea to ask Fuji to use FR as a platform to hold an survey under the forum’s users to find some common ground among those whom have had the camera’s skin separating and the ones who didn’t.

 

To date no answer to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...