Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If the X-E2 does get the rumoured FW update I imagine it will get the same focusing system as the X-T10. In that case it seems to me there is so little significant difference between the two that it comes down your preference for rangefinder style or DSLR style. Since the FW update is supposedly coming soon you shouldn't have too long to wait before being in a position to make a decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

at present the X-T10 has a clear advantage over the present X-E2 and not only about focussing but several other things.

 

Fuji has made repeated promises to produce some updates to the firmware but even then, the X-T10 will always have some things that the X-E2 ( or even the X-T1 as for example the 58 advanced preset modes).

 

 

So, my advise is to wait and see.

 

A couple of months at most will tell you what to do.

 

It is my feeling that the X-E2 will receive some update but still the X-T10 will have more. At the moment and since the X-T10 has come on the market, the price of the two cameras has been identical and people in shops are telling me that since then they practically stopped selling X-E2’s.

 

I am pretty much waiting to see if they are going to discount the X-E2 or offer it in some kit form with the new 35mm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would give some serious thought to a second hand X-E2, the prices on those are compelling. In the UK you could sell your X-E1 body only for about £150 and pick up an X-E2 body only for £250-£275 that might be a relatively cheap stop gap until the X-E3

 

Its a great camera, I upgraded to an X-T1 and to be honest, the AF upgrade seems to be more noticeable depending on your lens. IF you have the first primes 18/35/60 or the 55-200mm you are better off with an XT model, if you have the newer primes 23mm/56/16 etc or zooms you are going to notice less of a difference. I upgraded 4 months ago and i can honestly say there has only been one shot that I have doubts that I could have got with the X-E2 the rest I would have got them. I don't shoot sports, but if you have an X-E1 then you probably don't either :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you talking of the new or second hand X-E2 prices?

 

I know that for some mysterious reasons Fuji UK is always putting out better offers, better cash-backs ( although I hate the cash-back system, often made and designed to exhaust people who will be entangled in the mazes of the system and not get the money back), mysteriously reserved only to people living in the UK.

 

But for the rest of the Europeans this is not the case.

 

 

New X-E2 bodies are now priced at the exact same price of the X-T10. There are very few X-E2 secondhand ones around in shops (and they are expensive and very very few are offered on the classified market, even here on FR where I haven’t seen any advertised ).

 

So if prices are still ( even for Xmas) the same between the older and newer camera  ( one with more advanced features  than the other) and not yet knowing what the X-E2 future firmware upgrade will be (it was promised many months ago following a serious movement of disappointment among X-E2 owners but it has been never been more than a vague promise which took forever before it was even remotely ascribable to official Fuji head office  ) how could anyone buy NOW a NEW X-E2 when the X-T10 is giving you a lot more and for sure?

 

You would have to find a good secondhand one. That has proven, in my neck of the woods, easier said than done.

 

 

 

Only a couple of X-E2 bodies became available in recent times in the most popular Dutch classified ad site. One sold few hours after it was offered at €275, the other one was pulled from his owner because he was getting offers in the same range and he wanted more ( and nobody would meet his expectations) so he decided to keep the camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...