Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have had a Fuji X-E2 converted to IR, but I am getting a bit fed up with the hot spots that Fuji lenses seem quite bad at creating.  I know that opening up the aperture helps reduce hot spots but would like to use f11 or so.  I understand that you don`t get hotspots with manual focus lenses and I am wondering whether to get an old film lens or would a Samyang work, at least with a Samyang I wouldn`t need an adapter.  Any advice would be welcome. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a modified XE1 (720nm) my experience of hotspots /lens suitability is as follows:

14 F2.8 - excellent all apertures

16 F1.4 - ok no hotspot but not as good as 14. Normal colour performance exceptional.

16-55 F2.8 - mild hotspot.

23 F1.4 - Excellent all apertures

35 F1.4 - Excellent, but only used up to F11

 

That's my experience, I hear that 18-135 is good, as is 50-140.

 

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info, very useful. It looks like I need either a 14mm or MF lens.  To be honest I may go for the 12mm or 16mm Samyang and leave it permanently fixed t the X-E2.

I should also add to my first post that it`s false colour IR where I am having more of a difficulty, the mono stuff is a bit easier to correct than the colour, at least that`s what I am struggling with.  I`ll do more of a real world test when I get the chance and put up my findings, as it may be of use to someone else.

 

It seems I have a totally different collection of lenses to but my 35mm does not seem as good as yours.

 

I have the following:-

 

18-55mm

10-24mm

18mm

27mm

35mm f1.4

56mm

60mm

90mm (not tried yet)

 

I suppose the results may be different for different filters and also where the sun is maybe.

 

Thanks for taking the time to put your results up Jonesy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can also recommend the Zeiss Touit 12mm for IR.

 

Best regards,

Dieter

 

I almost bought this but went for the 10-24mm for the versatility, no regrets as the 10-24 is a great lens but sometimes I do think what if...?  I probably couldn`t justify buying the Zeiss 12mm just for IR,  I think I would have to sell the 10-24, which is an option I suppose.

Thanks Dieter.

 

Does anyone know if manual focus lenses solve the hotspot problem with IR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have had a Fuji X-E2 converted to IR, but I am getting a bit fed up with the hot spots that Fuji lenses seem quite bad at creating.  I know that opening up the aperture helps reduce hot spots but would like to use f11 or so.  I understand that you don`t get hotspots with manual focus lenses and I am wondering whether to get an old film lens or would a Samyang work, at least with a Samyang I wouldn`t need an adapter.  Any advice would be welcome. :)

Helios 44M-4  58mm f/2

Meyer-Optik Goerlitz Oreston 50mm f/1.8

Samyang/Rokinon 8mm fisheye & 12mm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a Fuji X-E2 converted to IR, but I am getting a bit fed up with the hot spots that Fuji lenses seem quite bad at creating.  I know that opening up the aperture helps reduce hot spots but would like to use f11 or so.  I understand that you don`t get hotspots with manual focus lenses and I am wondering whether to get an old film lens or would a Samyang work, at least with a Samyang I wouldn`t need an adapter.  Any advice would be welcome. :)

I forgot to mention various Nikon (with an adapter).  Don't get the "G" - no aperture ring-  besides the pre-G non AF are usually very inexpensive on E-bay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Helios 44M-4  58mm f/2

Meyer-Optik Goerlitz Oreston 50mm f/1.8

Samyang/Rokinon 8mm fisheye & 12mm

 

I have spoken to the guys that did my conversion and they have a customer who recommends the Samyang 10mm, but the 12mm not so great for hotspots.

 

But thanks for the useful info. :)

 

I probably won`t make a decision until nearer the Spring so the more info the better guys. B)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to the guys that did my conversion and they have a customer who recommends the Samyang 10mm, but the 12mm not so great for hotspots.

 

But thanks for the useful info. :)

 

I probably won`t make a decision until nearer the Spring so the more info the better guys. B)

You may be right about the Samyang.  The DOF is so deep that I usually don't bother to stop it down much so I may not have noticed.

 

 

Try this URL for a list to the good and the bad   http://kolarivision.com/articles/lens-hotspot-list/

 

FYI: According to LifePixel the problem arises from the internal flat black coating on the lens barrel.  Some coating materials which absorb visible light are highly reflective of IR   This may be why the X-T1 IR is still on hold.  Perhaps Fuji is researching IR absorptive coatings

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be right about the Samyang.  The DOF is so deep that I usually don't bother to stop it down much so I may not have noticed.

 

 

Try this URL for a list to the good and the bad   http://kolarivision.com/articles/lens-hotspot-list/

 

FYI: According to LifePixel the problem arises from the internal flat black coating on the lens barrel.  Some coating materials which absorb visible light are highly reflective of IR   This may be why the X-T1 IR is still on hold.  Perhaps Fuji is researching IR absorptive coatings

 

Nice find with the list, thanks. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...