Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The exposure compensation is very useful even in manual mode and is present on other fujifilm bodies and other brands. For instance, the experience shows some time is better to go -1 EV in manual mode (A and S) with auto ISO, just to preserve nuances in over illuminated zones of the photo frame. This is just an example, there are many other situations the exposure compensation is very welcomed in manual mode (when you really need to control both A and S) and the compensation to be done at the level of ISO, with your choice of +/- EV. This is my experience with X-T20 and Nikon DSLRs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Gion said:

Thank you very much Robnl! It is exactly what I needed.

All the best,

Gabriel 

I made the setup, it worked for a while (very short time) but now has an erratic behaviour (the left dial). Most of the time is not working,  no exposure compensation; after the rotation of the dial nothing happens.

It is clear there is huge room to improve the firmware of the X-S10!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Gion said:

I made the setup, it worked for a while (very short time) but now has an erratic behaviour (the left dial). Most of the time is not working,  no exposure compensation; after the rotation of the dial nothing happens.

It is clear there is huge room to improve the firmware of the X-S10!!

Good news, a major firmware update (2.0) is apparently coming this month! Hopefully that fixes up some of the issues you're having. It's apparently adding tethering as well if you're into that. But before you bench the camera while waiting, make sure you are familiar with the following 3 settings which can cause erratic behavior with exposure compensation:

1) Auto ISO (iso button on top of camera): This needs to be on for the exposure compensation to work. Also make sure the range is not too narrow since the camera won't go outside this.

Example: it's a really bright day and the auto-iso sets iso160. You are currently at -1 compensation, but no matter how much you turn the dial it won't lower the exposure since the camera is at the minimum possible iso already. 

This quickly becomes confusing because it seems that there is a difference between the current exposure and the setpoint exposure. What you see on screen is the current exposure, in other words the exposure the camera is currently using based on your settings. When you turn the dial you are changing the setpoint exposure, in other words the exposure the camera is trying to reach (but may not be able to). Since this setpoint has no on-screen indicator, it can look like turning the dial isn't doing anything when you are far outside the range of possible iso values.

Example: on the same sunny day as above where you are stuck at -1 compensation, if you keep trying to lower the exposure, your setpoint may go all the way down to -5, but the on-screen indicator will still show -1 since the camera can't go any lower with current settings. If you start to turn the dial in the other direction to increase the exposure again, it will look like nothing is happening! This is because you have to move your setpoint all the way back up to above -1 before the on screen indicator will move, and this may take quite a few clicks of the wheel since you are down at -5. 

Recommendation: Set iso to auto with as wide of a range as possible. Be cognizant of very bright or very dark scenes where your exposure settings may be out of the range achievable by the auto-iso, as the exposure dial will seem unresponsive here.

Tip: half press the shutter to check your current iso, if its 12800 (max), or 640/320/160 (min depending on DR settings), then the exposure compensation dial may lose responsiveness as you are at the limits of the camera. 

2) Dynamic Range (Settings->IQ->page 2). DR100 is normal, at this setting the camera's minimum iso is 160. DR200 lowers the exposure of the bright areas by 1 stop, but increases minimum iso to 320. DR400 lowers the exposure of the bright areas by 2 stops, but increases minimum iso to 640. 

We just saw in the Auto ISO section above that having too small an ISO range can make the exposure compensation dial seem unresponsive. Activating the DR200 or DR400 settings further shrinks this range, making it seem unresponsive over an even larger range of settings. Using the "auto" DR setting is even worse, since the camera will be trying to change the DR to what it thinks it should be, which may directly counter your manual exposure settings! You are then in a fight with the camera over exposure which makes the exposure meter jump around erratically. 

Example: In our example above, our exposure compensation was unresponsive at -1 and lower. If we now turn the camera to DR400 it may be unresponsive at +1 or lower. 

Recommendation: Set Dynamic Range to DR100 (at least when you don't need the higher modes)

3) D Range Priority (Settings->IQ->page 2): This combines the dynamic range settings with alterations to the tone curve. So the same issues that exist with the DR settings (higher minimum iso, problems with the camera fighting against your manual settings) will occur here as well. 

Recommendation: Set D Range Priority to off

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Robnl said:

Good news, a major firmware update (2.0) is apparently coming this month! Hopefully that fixes up some of the issues you're having. It's apparently adding tethering as well if you're into that. But before you bench the camera while waiting, make sure you are familiar with the following 3 settings which can cause erratic behavior with exposure compensation:

1) Auto ISO (iso button on top of camera): This needs to be on for the exposure compensation to work. Also make sure the range is not too narrow since the camera won't go outside this.

Example: it's a really bright day and the auto-iso sets iso160. You are currently at -1 compensation, but no matter how much you turn the dial it won't lower the exposure since the camera is at the minimum possible iso already. 

This quickly becomes confusing because it seems that there is a difference between the current exposure and the setpoint exposure. What you see on screen is the current exposure, in other words the exposure the camera is currently using based on your settings. When you turn the dial you are changing the setpoint exposure, in other words the exposure the camera is trying to reach (but may not be able to). Since this setpoint has no on-screen indicator, it can look like turning the dial isn't doing anything when you are far outside the range of possible iso values.

Example: on the same sunny day as above where you are stuck at -1 compensation, if you keep trying to lower the exposure, your setpoint may go all the way down to -5, but the on-screen indicator will still show -1 since the camera can't go any lower with current settings. If you start to turn the dial in the other direction to increase the exposure again, it will look like nothing is happening! This is because you have to move your setpoint all the way back up to above -1 before the on screen indicator will move, and this may take quite a few clicks of the wheel since you are down at -5. 

Recommendation: Set iso to auto with as wide of a range as possible. Be cognizant of very bright or very dark scenes where your exposure settings may be out of the range achievable by the auto-iso, as the exposure dial will seem unresponsive here.

Tip: half press the shutter to check your current iso, if its 12800 (max), or 640/320/160 (min depending on DR settings), then the exposure compensation dial may lose responsiveness as you are at the limits of the camera. 

2) Dynamic Range (Settings->IQ->page 2). DR100 is normal, at this setting the camera's minimum iso is 160. DR200 lowers the exposure of the bright areas by 1 stop, but increases minimum iso to 320. DR400 lowers the exposure of the bright areas by 2 stops, but increases minimum iso to 640. 

We just saw in the Auto ISO section above that having too small an ISO range can make the exposure compensation dial seem unresponsive. Activating the DR200 or DR400 settings further shrinks this range, making it seem unresponsive over an even larger range of settings. Using the "auto" DR setting is even worse, since the camera will be trying to change the DR to what it thinks it should be, which may directly counter your manual exposure settings! You are then in a fight with the camera over exposure which makes the exposure meter jump around erratically. 

Example: In our example above, our exposure compensation was unresponsive at -1 and lower. If we now turn the camera to DR400 it may be unresponsive at +1 or lower. 

Recommendation: Set Dynamic Range to DR100 (at least when you don't need the higher modes)

3) D Range Priority (Settings->IQ->page 2): This combines the dynamic range settings with alterations to the tone curve. So the same issues that exist with the DR settings (higher minimum iso, problems with the camera fighting against your manual settings) will occur here as well. 

Recommendation: Set D Range Priority to off

 

Hi Rob,

and thank you for spending time on this subject, but from my point of view the capability to use the exposure compensation with M mode make the difference and allows to shoot as creatively as possible. All the settings were as you mentioned, except D-range that was on auto. I put it off and now I am just testing again.

All the best,

Gabriel

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 6/25/2021 at 3:51 AM, Robnl said:

Menu Button->Set Up (the wrench icon)->Button/Dial Settings->Function (Fn) Setting

From here, scroll to page 2 and change Fn-D to the second default which changes the left dial to exposure compensation only when in manual mode. 

Hi, I am able to change the Fn-D to Exposure Comp. , but it applies to all modes not just to Manual mode only. 
How do I apply button setting to Manual mode only?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Old post but hope this can help. You have to make sure that exp. comp. is set to zero in P, S or A mode before you go in to manual mode. If the comp is set to, let say +5, and this is of the range for the settings in manual mode, twisting the comp dial (left dial) want do any changes. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 6/24/2021 at 10:51 PM, Robnl said:

Menu Button->Set Up (the wrench icon)->Button/Dial Settings->Function (Fn) Setting

From here, scroll to page 2 and change Fn-D to the second default which changes the left dial to exposure compensation only when in manual mode. 

Hei Robnl, can you tell me how to disable it in manual mode on a XF10? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...