Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

Here's more details on the X-T10 from photorumors.com:

 

http://photorumors.com/2015/05/12/this-is-the-fujifilm-x-t10-mirrorless-camera/

 

  • 16.3 MP APS-c X-Trans CMOS II sensor
  • Ultrasonic sensor cleaning system
  • Continuous AF tracking with 8 frames per second
  • 51,200 max ISO sensitivity
  • Scene auto recognition
  • 0.08s fast intelligent hybrid AF
  • 49 AF points
  • EVF: 2,360,000 dots. 0.62 x magnification and 100% coverage (lag time is 0.005s)
  • Startup time is 0.5 seconds, shutter lag is 0.05 seconds
  • Quiet and high speed electronic shutter (60 - 1/32,000)
  • 920,000 dots 3.0" LCD screen
  • Video: 1080p 60/50/30/25/24 fps (with manual exposure)
  • Built-in Wi-Fi, smartphone or tablet remote control possible
  • P/S/A/M exposure mode
  • 5 different auto bracketing modes
  • 8 different advanced filters
  • Built-in pop-up flash
  • Interval timer, time lapse functionality
  • Metal body with five dials
  • Battery: NP-W126 (350 shots per charge)
  • Kit lens: XC 16-50 mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS II
Fujifilm-X-T10-mirrorless-camera.jpg

Fujifilm-X-T10-mirrorless-camera-back.jp

Fujifilm-X-T10-mirrorless-camera-top.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to this and was wondering if any of you know how long it usually takes from announcement of a new product until the consumer can have one in their hands? Does it vary?

 

I have an x-e1 and x-a1 that I would like to turn into an x-t10.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Andrew Brown

as i'm now getting back into photography and will most definitely looking at a Fuji X body, wondering what the price of this will be, given that I can get an XT1 body for £850 here in Blighty (or for £600 an X-Pro 1 with 2 lenses).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to this and was wondering if any of you know how long it usually takes from announcement of a new product until the consumer can have one in their hands? Does it vary?

In general it varies a lot – and a planned shipping date may slip for unforeseen reasons – but about a month might be a good guess in this case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ShawnDavie

The play button should switch places with the trash can.  The trash can is not an important button and one most people will seldom use yet its where you can hit it accidentally and find it it the dark..  Play would be better there

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed. However I'm guessing you first has to be in playback mode before the trash button works. The dedicated trash button is kind of a waste imho. It would be better if it was muxed with something else that is not used in playback mode.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...