duncansebastian

Interesting suggestions. I, too, would like to see a better low-light performance at higher ISO, but I doubt they will reduce the amount of pixels, for that purpose. Better to expect a slight increase in performance, by tweaking the software, maybe a new sensor could help, too. This is the new info we got, about the X-T3 and we can speculate, we would see those improvements on the X-Pro3, as well : Quoting Patrick from Fujirumors : "If the rumor is correct, then there will be 3 main aspects, that will make the Fujifilm X-T3 a speed monster: stacked sensor (allows fast sensor readout)“only” 26MP (not excessively many megapixel means less data to elaborate for the processor)new X-Processor Keep in mind that, as we also already told you, the Fujifilm X-T3 will not have IBIS and be announced around photokina 2018 (September)" So, what do you think?

But there is always the cheaper and appreciated Samyang 12mm f2.0 NCS

I am comparing XF 16mm F1.4 vs XF 14mm F2.8. I need the advantage of F1.4 as I love to shoot in low light situations. I wished the 14mm was F2.0, instead of F2.8; I am still considering the 14mm, as I thing this is the widest focal length, until you get some disturbing distorsions (12mm, 10mm, etc). And all comparison tests have their flaws, but I've seen 2 situations when the highly appreciated XF 16mm F1.4 offered less IQ than the older XF 14mm F2.8. Which makes my decision even harder. I don't know if this helps.

I think this is my impression, too. When I need the fastest AF, I switch to EVF and that is in low light conditions, mostly, or shooting some action. I wonder what improvements we will get in the future X-Pro3.

Is it me, or The XF 56mm F1.2 R brings more contrast than the Leica lens?

It is possible that XF 23mm F2.0 might be a little faster in AF than it's older brother the XF 35mm F2.0, but I've done no scientific comparison tests for this statement. In low light, when your lenses started to hunt for focus, my best ways to cope with the situation are: 1. enlarge the green square focus point (less spot precision, but higher AF speed) 2. Directly focus on zones with contrast, in my frame 3. Use manual focus mode with Focus Peaking activated. I may save battery, time and nerves and probably get more sharp pictures.

I would like to see the size, magnification and refresh rate of the EVF of X-T2, also implemented in the X-Pro3. But, without eliminating the OVF. This would be a technical challenge that will please almost everybody, if successfully mastered.

That's a good question. What I know is that using manual focus lenses in Manual Focus mode (of course) will preserve your battery. I have no idea, when using Fujifilm lenses in Manual Focus mode.

Hello Fuji fans and also, X-Pro series lovers, I am really interested in the future X-Pro3, as I had the X-Pro1 and now I happily use the X-Pro2. We all have specific reasons to love the X-Pro series and I think the X-Pro3 would be an interesting topic to discuss, too. Looking at the launching dates of X-Pro1 and X-Pro2, compared to the dates when X-T1 and X-T2 were launched, I hoped I could see a pattern in Fujifilm's calendar; where X-Pro series presents us technical improvements that will follow on the X-T series. But with the rumoured X-T3 launching date for September 2018 and no consistent info on the upcoming X-Pro3, this pattern isn't valid any longer. We'll have, this time, the X-T3 before the X-Pro3, that we almost know nothing about. It seems the market trends and the competition can dictate changes in the calendar pattern I was talking about. I invite you to share your impressions on the X-Pro3; what would you like to see on this future model, when do you think it will be announced? So far, I could only speculate that X-Pro3 will get the improvements that are rumoured to be implemented within X-T3: 1. New X PRO Processor. A new, faster, one, or we could speculate the presence of 2 X Pro Processors, to cope with the new performance requirements; 2. New software, with improved AF and better noise reduction - what we see inside the X-H1; 3. New X-Trans sensor, as rumoured, with a resolution over 24 MP, but less than 30 MP. A 28 MP resolution could make sense, in order to get resolution improvements, but still not sacrificing low-light performance and not putting too much strain on the processor(s); 4. Some new aspects, like ETERNA, (plus the improved AF and noise reduction I was mentioning above) and maybe video improvements (that I don't find particularly necessary, especially when we have X-H1 for that and even the improved X-T2); 5. A better build body with more scratch resistant cover, better weather sealing and with a more resistant magnesium alloy chassis, as the X-H1 is over the X-T2; with 25% improved resistance. What I also would like to see is: A. A better battery, or battery life - as this is also a very important aspect and with increased performance, may also come an increased energy consumption. B. A larger viewfinder - at least at the eye exit level, with a better refresh rate for the electronic viewfinder. C. Some button reconfiguration - if necessary, or an extra Fn button, for better accessibility. I don't have a long list of requests, as I am happy with my X-Pro2, but I think I have covered important aspects that we could (and we would like to) see in the upcoming X-Pro3. I invite you to share with us your ideas and comments. May the Light be with you! Best regards, Sebastian

I have tested the X-H1 for a few minutes, thanks to Fujifilm Belgium's presence at Brussels Photo Days. I can tell you that there is a difference between the impression that the camera leaves you by looking at it and the impression you get when you actually hold it and use it. It was a pleasing experience to use it! Improved ergonomics, especially for pros, especially for video work, especially when using larger lenses. The size and design of the camera were thought having in mind the requests of pros, doing this type of work. And as it seems logical, IBIS is only for the X-H series (at least for now). There is no physical space (and maybe not the real need) to be implemented in the X-Pro and X-T series.

They will still be more compact and lighter than a mid-end DSLR and you cannot expect a FLAGSHIP camera to be something like the X-E3.

This is an important day in Fujifilm's history, as IBIS is a really new and solid chapter in technical progress. Of course there are pros and cons and most of us have a pretty good idea about the "pros", but we should also discuss the "cons". The price, could be one of the consequences of having such a different and powerful camera in Fujifilm's line-up. One quick technical question comes to mind: How IBIS will affect battery life? By how much? Tips to maximize the batter life (excepting turning IBIS OFF - can we turn it OFF, by the way?)? Interesting and useful things to know. Cheers, Sebastian

I had the X-Pro1, but I had to sell it. My budget was really small, I had no choice. But X-Pro1 is a camera you should never sell. Never! If you could get the money for another X Camera (I couldn't) it's better to keep the X-Pro1. It's a classic and will always be. Best design, fantastic size/shape/weight and finishing. I wish my X-T1 would have the same length and general size ratio, for better grip and handling.

I am curious if AFS mode gets any better. And while in AFC mode with tracking, Eye Detection and every other improvements, how much additional stress gets on the battery autonomy?

Incredible what X100S lens can do!

Hello Fuji lovers, I would like Fujifilm to create a piece of hardware, an external device, a Raw Converter, based on the algorithms and electronics found inside the X cameras, with maybe some more features, if possible, which can be also an external back-up storage drive, with an LCD, bigger than what we have on an X camera (let's say 4"). SD reader, USB, Wi-Fi to communicate with the camera, or a smartphone, built-in Flash/SSD storage (min 128-256 Gb), maybe tethering On The Go, using an existing battery (from X100 series for example), if possible. Why? 1. Because it could be the coolest device for photographers and it will be so unique and it is doable. Everything is based on existing technology. There is nothing new here, except the new concept of putting all of these together in one piece of hardware. 2. This would end the problems when converting Fuji Raw file using different softwares for post-processing, like Photoshop, Lightroom, etc., especially On The Go. 3. Would be great to leave the laptop at home and travel really light, according to "Mirrorless Philosophy" as we use to do since adopting a Fujifilm mirrorless system, while making no compromise in IQ, using Raw files wherever you are with the flexibility of storing them safely on this device, or sending them to your / client smartphone / tablet / laptop. Some of you would say "I have the PC Tethering option" but I'd say "Not in this mobile/compact form, especially when you are on the shooting site." Others would say "My camera already has a built-in Raw Converter" but I'd say "Why not having a more powerful module with a bigger screen, maybe with Touchscreen and sliders, to really control your conversion settings and why keep the camera busy and spend battery resources, when some other device could do it faster and better and keep the camera just for shooting". POLL : 1. I WOULD LIKE TO BUY SUCH AN EXTERNAL DEVICE. (Please specify the price you would pay and some other essential features you would like this piece of hardware to have) 2. NOT INTERESTED (Please specify why.)

X-T2 I guess, if they have identical capabilities.

Hello everyone. I have a problem with a quite new Fuji X100S. If I try to acquire Focus on an object very close to the camera (in the Macro zone I would say), I get an error message : "please turn off camera and turn it on again". When switching off, there is a "motorized" sound like passing through all focus range, but sounds like a motor. Switch on again and the camera is ready to go again - everything is fine, until I try to capture an object, really close to my lens, the the problem occurs again. Anyone having the same problem? Some help, please ?!?! Thanks!

Very nice. I would love to see more Manual Focus, real-fast lenses on X Mount.

Sounds interesting! Of course, a first logical step for a MF camera would be with a fixed lens, like the 35mm FOV in FF format. If a zoom is prefered, the 24-70/85mm FOV in FF format would be fantastic (like XF 16-55mm used on 1.5X crop format). So I would vote for a 23mm filed of view in FF format, F2.0, for this new MF. Weather-sealed, better battery life (with more realistic battery indicator) and the top tech from Fuji to date (like the performances found in firmware Ver 4.0 for X-T1)

Sounds like a FF or Medium Format. (Wishful thinking)!