Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there!

 

I've received my X-H1 3 days ago...and I love it!

But I've just recognized, first, that the shutter on my X-H1 is much louder in vertical (portrait) orientation compared to landscape orientation (no matter which shutter speed). It's a more "clicky" sound. And second, when I hold the camera in landscape orientation, the shutter gets also a little bit louder with higher shutter speeds... anyone else? Is this normal?

 

Thanks,

Alex

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's what you want to do to set up a truly scientific test.

First let the acousticians measure sensitivity of both of your ears.

Second, you've got to measure exact distances between each of your ears and the camera shutter mechanism in both horizontal and vertical positions, as well as the angles between the ear surfaces and the direction of the vector connecting ear openings to the shutter mechanism. Then simple acoustical calculations will reveal the actual strength of the signals coming from the camera to each of your ears. If those results jive with your perseption then everithing works properly. Otherwise you should gather all this data and send it to Fujifilm along with your camera for investigation.

There ain't no need to thank me.

That's what all of us would do in such dire circumstances.

Good luck.

Please, keep us posted.

Edited by Arthur
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's what you want to do to set up a truly scientific test.

First let the acousticians measure sensitivity of both of your ears.

Second, you've got to measure exact distances between each of your ears and the camera shutter mechanism in both horizontal and vertical positions, as well as the angles between the ear surfaces and the direction of the vector connecting ear openings to the shutter mechanism. Then simple acoustical calculations will reveal the actual strength of the signals coming from the camera to each of your ears. If those results jive with your perseption then everithing works properly. Otherwise you should gather all this data and send it to Fujifilm along with your camera for investigation.

There ain't no need to thank me.

That's what all of us would do in such dire circumstances.

Good luck.

Please, keep us posted.

Hi Arthur,

 

Thank you for your advice! Of course, your statement makes sense, but I don't need a truly scientific test and real precise numbers. I trust my ears. I work in the audio business for 20 years now. A also have regular measurements of my hearing. That's required for my job.

And it's not important to me how much louder the sound really is. The fact that it is louder and different is enough for me.

Meanwhile it's also confirmed by ohter X-H1 users, that the shutter sound in portrait mode is different/louder. I will also visit my favorite camera store to make a final comparison with another X-H1 on Thursday. But so far it seems that my shutter is ok, and this is a "normal" behavior. And that's ok for me! It's a great camera!

I'll keep you updated...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...