Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The condensation trapped in the EVF glass on the inside after 20 minutes... 

Before it was half covered... After 30 minutes it was all gone...

36210952412_57b201267a_b.jpgFujifilm X-T2 Condensation by David Wong, on Flickr


===

Shot this with the X-T2 and XF 50mm in the rain wearing only a rain coat the other night...
 
Outside from 8pm until 12:30am in the rain all night... Body and Lens held up in the rain...
 
Only thing I didn't consider was condensation from placing the camera from my bag and then taking it out to shoot... It could had been the humidity outside but I think it was my bag...
 
Interior of the EVF glass was fogged up for about 30 minutes then the condensation disappeared...
 
Anyone else have experiences with the elements outside?
 
 

35551378044_49a8e15552_b.jpgPurple Rain by David Wong, on Flickr
Edited by ericdraven
Link to post
Share on other sites

interesting since this should be a WR set with WR lens and WR camera... What does WR stand for if it fogs up inside?

 

I have used my X-T1 in the tropics but without a WR lens so it did fog up.

 

When  you go from an airconditioned environment to the warm and damp outside the lens fogs up (and maybe the sensor does too, not unimportantly also for implications that tiny specs of dust could become glued beyond blowing to the sensor!).

 

So, normally you wait that the fogging clears up, it takes a minute or so.

 

I have never had the viewfinder fogging though it was always the lens (and it might have been the sensor too).

 

I shouldn’t think that this is norma and probably indicates a loss of the WR somehow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I experienced viewfinder fogging in my X-T2. I had been in very wet conditions the previous day and then very cold conditions. It cleared ok once I got the camera back inside. However I had lost the eyepiece earlier in the week and this may be a part of the sealing. You have to remember that "weather sealed" does not mean waterproof. In fact it's a pretty meaningles statement. This is the same with other makes though. I don't know of any current interchangeable lens camera that is waterproof. So the message is that you still have to be a little careful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you have to have a pretty extreme set of circumstances. My camera was soaked on one day and frozen the second. Such is the weather in the far north of Scotland in winter. I agree though that it's a little worrying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...