Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://fotopolis.pl/ found in their X-T10 test, regarding white balance the following „defect“:

- „Unsuccessful predefined levels of white balance modes. The use of any mode (except Auto) associated with abnormal color reproduction.“

- „Slight tendency to hot color rendering“.

May this perhaps already be „repaired“ in the cameras delivered?

Regards Rieke

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always found (with both my Nikon and Fuji cameras) that WB presets are rarely correct without adjustment. Auto WB is considerably better, but only within a certain band or relatively "normal" lighting temps. It's OK by me - I believe that, like exposure, the photographer should be in charge of this, not some algorithm. The solution is simple - shoot jpeg, but determine the color temperature before the shot - or shoot RAW and determine it after the fact. For snapshots in normal lighting, the Auto White Balance performs quite well. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flash always worked well for me in Auto WB. I believe the camera is inclined to choose something close to flash color temp when the flash is deployed. Some types of artificial light are another matter - older florescent lights can be very challenging. A room full of old fluorescent tubes - all different brands and ages is a multicolor light show - and they flicker at line frequency! I find modern LED lighting to be vastly superior. A mixture of lighting types can be extremely challenging as the camera can only be set for one color temperature. This is one reason why some photographers love studios where all of this can be controlled. And black & white.

 

Anyone who uses flash on a regular basis will have a set of filters to "correct" the flash to the same color temperature as the other lighting.

 

I have gone as far as to shoot raw, and process layers based on color temp, then combine the layers to get rid of odd color shadows in a photo lit by multiple types of lighting!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much, Elmar, for sharing your findings regarding WB at different artificial lights and flash! We suppose, this will be an issue for digital cameras in general, not expressively for the X-T10.

Regards Gert and Rieke

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been doing some colour testing today (mostly looking at in-camera rendering vs Lightroom) and I found the X-T10's daylight white balance is noticably 'off' compared to what Lightroom thinks it should be. (Note: Lightroom's WB is matched by Canon and most Nikon and Sony cameras and is based on the decades-old standard that 5,500k is daylight.)

The in-camera files that were set to daylight balance which reads as 5,200k w/ +7 tint towards magenta, whereas Lightroom's daylight balance is 5,500k and +10 towards magenta. Interestingly, using Lightroom's auto WB gives a reading of 5,350k w/ +28 tint towards magenta and using the WB picker on a grey patch gives me 5,150k and a +35 tint towards magenta. This is a ColorChecker target under daylight balance InterFit lights which I use for product photography. I tested with the 14mm, 35mm, 56mm and 60mm lenses. The 60mm came out warmer, but the other three all hit these same white balance numbers.

This would suggest that Fuji—or at least the X-T10—actually have their predefined white balances set with a very heavy green cast, and very slightly cool compared to industry standards.

I must say, even when I first got my first Fuji camera—the X100S—and I didn't intend to use Fuji for serious work and didn't bother to test the colour properly, I always though the white balance, regardless of whether I picked a predefined one or left it on auto, always ran a little cold and so even for casual shooting, I left auto WB with +1 towards both yellow and red/magenta, and I tweaked the daylight and shade balances slightly warm, too. That was just by eye back then, but my recent testing of the X-T10's colour seems to suggest I was right to do so.

edit: oh and if anyone wants further reading on the X-T10's colour, I've made a thread HERE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

@all

Thank you for all your findings regarding WB! 

We are "happy hobby jpg shooters" ;). We do care for image colors, which we feel are ok at daylight with Fuji Provia. 

Regarding WB at different artificial lights and/or flash I found Classic Chrome very helpful, when testing my brand new X-T10! :wub:

Kind regards 

Rieke

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...