Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Long story short. I started photography as a hobby in High School. Did it as a side gig through college. Then got a “real” job and life, kids, etc got in the way. I’m in a position to pick the hobby back up, but I’ve been out of the game so long I feel like my head is spinning. I exited the game with a used X-t3.  
I think I’m mainly settled on a used X-t5 body($1450) or used/new X-s20. I read all the reviews, watch the YouTube videos and my main question is, is the X-t5 worth the update?

What am I shooting? Glad you asked haha

Travel Camera (not concerned about size or weight TBH, travel like camping, road trips, etc),  kids sports, nature, landscape. 
I’m leaning X-t5 for the WR and upgraded processor but I’m open to suggestions. Budget is $1500 for body only but would like less than that if possible. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The x-t5 is certainly an upgrade on the x-t3, not least of which is the bigger battery, but it really is difficult to advise you. The x-s20 is ergonomically a very different camera to the x-t5. It is so important to feel comfortable with a camera. Is there a camera dealer that you could visit to try them out? Another thing is that the x-s20 is 26mp and the x- t5 is 40mp. If you don't want to make big prints it is no advantage in having 40mp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't agree about the increased pixel count only being useful if you print big prints. 

It also gives the ability to crop the image giving the 45MP sensor an effective 1.3x zoom with no loss of pixels compared to the 26MP sensor. 

For travel purposes it's a worthwhile thing as it reduces the size/number of lenses needed to achieve like images. 

 

For the OP it will depend a lot on your skill level and intended usage. 

The X-T5 is more oriented to photography with all the normal controls exposed on the top plate whereas the X-S20 is more video oriented with photography controls tucked away more. 

Edited by thelostkiwi
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, thelostkiwi said:

It also gives the ability to crop the image giving the 45MP sensor an effective 1.3x zoom with no loss of pixels compared to the 26MP sensor. 

For travel purposes it's a worthwhile thing as it reduces the size/number of lenses needed to achieve like images. 

This is playing into the megapixel myth a bit.

The sensors’ sizes (dimensions) are almost identical, the higher resolution is coming from using smaller pixels, which can lead to less dynamic range, more noise and diffraction. It is possible in some cases to get more detail, but the benefits are limited. Otherwise, those high resolution cell phone cameras would have made all of these cameras so obsolete, no one would use them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on your needs and preferences, I recommend the X-T5. It offers an outstanding balance of features, performance, and durability. If you can find a used X-T5 within your budget, you might be able to save some money without compromising on quality. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...