Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am looking at expanding my lens selection for the (new to me) GFX100S. Looking at my usage on the 35mm FF, perhaps the most common lenses I use are the 20mm, the 15mm with some use of the Laowa 12mm.

I have been considering options. I already have the 45mm F2.8. One possibility would be the 20-35mm F4 zoom but I am not a fan of zoom lenses except for lightweight travel and for that I would probably take the X-T5. So a more likely option would be both the 23mm and 30mm lenses which would be easier to source and cheaper. If I go that route, the next step would be one of the Laowa's.

So the question is does anyone have any experience of the 17/4 or the 19/2.8? My understanding is that the 17mm lens is basically the same optical formula as the 12mm FF lens(which is excellent) with an in built MFC whereas the 19mm is specifically designed for the MF size sensor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have the GF20-35 and like it very much.  I find it tough to shoot ultrawide primes without constantly changing lenses.  The usual reduction on optical quality doesn't seem to apply to the 20-35.  I'm kind of the opposite, use longer lenses on the XT5 since they are so much smaller.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure I know how to describe it.  To me, it has a familiar Fuji Gfx look in a wide angle if that means anything to you.  It can capture a big wide view with great detail and also has pretty good detail used closer up.  It even has pretty good bokeh for this type of lens.  Sunstars are kind of ordinary but I haven't played with that too much. AF is a little faster than the 32-64 and seems accurate.  I've not used the 23 but for me this lens is exceptional.  I've never seen a zoom lens in this focal range anywhere close to this good and I think it would rival the primes in optical quality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear friend,

I had the GF 23 and 30 and I replaced them both with the GF20-35.

No regrets: the zoom is of the highest level, not heavy and of similar dimensions to the 23mm.

You can find some photos in my gallery.

Don't think twice: 20-35 for life... The Laowa is a good lens but if you try the Fuji zoom you will never go back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Well since my OP, I have got both the 23 and 30mm lenses Might look at the 20-35 at a later date. However I came across a Laowa 17 mm at a silly low price and am very pleased with it. The extra few mm's may not seem like much but they do make a difference and it is a great lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
×
×
  • Create New...