Jump to content

A forum demographic survey? Would Fuji be interested in a co-operation?


Recommended Posts

I am sure that Fuji does carry out their own surveys to assess market trends, market base composition and client satisfaction.

 

But since a Fuji targeted forum naturally offers them a targeted audience (as their own free on line Fuji X magazine is doing too), offering Fuji's management to be reaching towards the Fuji crowd in an attempt of assessing who the typical Fuji user , what are his or her likes or dislikes, and his or her expectations for the future developments of the brand, would be an important step forward for us as it probably would be for them.

 

Judging from the so called “ polls” and “ votes” on many issues, the participants to this forum seem to have a need to assess things and to play (by means of voting which is a first to me, since we don’t normally vote to have our daily bread in this shape, color or other but we seem to want to do that for cameras and lenses) a more propositive role than the one that we already do by voting with our wallets.

 

All this “ wanting to stand and be counted” maybe could be appreciated by Fujifilm? I wonder. Maybe it does.

 

Some members here are very forthcoming with information already. From the pictures which may publish of themselves and their geographical distribution some definite patterns seem to appear.

 

But more in depth information would be needed to really get to know the Fuji customer, things that we might not want to share in public and associated to our names or monickers, like income, education levels, and other such more personal things.

 

So the polls have to be held in a way that makes it possible to keep privacy.

 

Also a survey like this would be better left to professionals because it is not only about knowing how many middle aged man and women or how many hipsters buy Fuji but it is a bit more complex than that.

 

That’s why we need to involve Fuji with this. They have the market expertise to devise a survey which would also be useful along with being well formulated. We probably don’t.

 

I am sure that the forum ownership itself would benefit from knowing the forum dwellers more than they might do now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuji won't publicly acknowledge rumour/gossip sites like this, and they're loathe to acknowledge other unofficial Fuji sites. They know they exist—they even read them themselves—but they will not publicly acknowledge them. No chance they'd have any interest in using the member base of any such website for marketing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few hundred—thousand or so if we really stretch it—people on a Fuji enthusiast forum in no way represents any market, in any region.

People need to learn that the kinds of users who come to sites like this are the crazy 1%—and hey, I include myself in that—and the most typical user of these products is an entirely different beast.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surveys are never conducted on 100% of the users but are are sample target and are limited to a certain amont of users which represent the target that one wants to know about.

 

A survey on this forum would be as good as any, and, my take on this, statistically relevant at the very least for the European and American market. I agree that the Asian market has different characteristics but I am quite confident that here , albeit perhaps a small group of geeks, we are statistically relevant to the Fuji marketing purposes.

 

http://greatbrook.com/survey-statistical-confidence-how-many-is-enough/

 

on on line research (including fora, blogs and social media)

 

http://www.hubspot.com/marketing-statistics-1

 

I find it funny that people think that we are not relevant and yet polls, voting sessions, prayers and requests are continuously made, on this forum, for lenses, firmware updates new features and so on.

 

It is one way or the other.

 

We either don’t offer a meaningful sample because we are only a bunch of geeks not representative of the majority of the Fujifilm users ( in that case what’s the point in voting, asking or begging? If we are irrelevant Fuji won’t care...) or we are a representative and meaningful group ( and if we do then we are a relevant focus group).

Edited by milandro
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...