Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I still find it rather funny that the whole imaging segment is actually not loosing too much money thanks to the sales of Instax related products.

 

Not sure I would like to be in the shoes of the head of R&D department when he needs to go and negotiate budget for new lens/camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be, they're all women in my case.

Ok. My nieces have them too. Easy to buy presents for them. They get so thrilled when I pass them refill boxes. Mind you, they ain't cheap....in the long run.

 

However, the prints last a surprising number of years without fade.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't get the instax hype either - until I bought one.

 

It's an incredible experience handing out those prints. I'd recommend every X Shooter to give the SP1 printer a trial

 

Tempted.....

 

I'll carry my X-Pro and instax as back up. :lol:

 

No seriously, I know what you mean.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was at a wedding last week as second shooter, my SP1 printer was quite the attraction of a lot of the ppl around.

 

In a world more and more often digital, almost nobody print pictures anymore. Even my own wedding pictures are not printed in a book. So when you hand out something physical there is something really novel about it. It feels good to have something small and durable and you can just put up on your fridge as memorabilia.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tempted.....

 

I'll carry my X-Pro and instax as back up. :lol:

 

No seriously, I know what you mean.

;)

https://youtu.be/Wm3ewU2FUow?t=388

 

Zack Arias also loves his printer :)

 

I was at a wedding last week as second shooter, my SP1 printer was quite the attraction of a lot of the ppl around.

 

At weddings, events, parties the instax printer is one of the highlights. People just love printed pictures (especially instant film). The most funny part is, when they photograph their instax prints, and put in on facebook/instagram :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have more friends that have those than real cameras, all in their 20's and all female though.

 

Good to know, thanks. I daren't generalize here but most of my female friends, nieces included love instant results and rather not fuss about more "complicated" real cameras. Either that or the smartphones....

Link to post
Share on other sites

;)

https://youtu.be/Wm3ewU2FUow?t=388

 

Zack Arias also loves his printer :)

 

 

At weddings, events, parties the instax printer is one of the highlights. People just love printed pictures (especially instant film). The most funny part is, when they photograph their instax prints, and put in on facebook/instagram :D

What an excellent idea! It's perfect for shooting in remote regions. The novelty will have 'em pose beautiful shots!

 

Ok. Now I'm convinced with the instax printer. Will get one. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...