Jump to content

London - Shoreditch


Ajthirtytwo

Recommended Posts

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

0bb9063150dee3fcf0358eafbad1175b.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few thoughts:

  • Posting your before and after photos is unnecessary.  Most of them aren't different enough from the original (in these small web JPGs, at least) to mean much to anyone but you. Show us your final vision.  I will say this small bit about post-processing, though... If you're presenting these as a set or a "portfolio" of Shoreditch you'll be well served to have a consistent look about them.  The "Barber & Parlour" shot, for instance, is vastly different from the rest and seems really out of place.  Was there some reason for the heavy processing in that shot?  Does it feel more like Shoreditch to you?  Is that processing helping to convey your meaning or the feeling of the place?  Would it be appropriate to use that on all of the photos in this set?
  • I find the photos to generally be lacking a subject or focus.  My eye doesn't know where to look in many of the shots.  The "Gap" shot, for instance... what is this showing me?  I do like the graphic element of the line of signs, but the one closest to us is out of focus and the others are shrouded behind it, so are unreadable.  My eye is left to wander about trying to land on some information, moment, or aspect of Shoreditch that you are trying to portray. If you had perhaps moved a bit to your left, this could act as leading lines to the lady in the middle.  Similar for the shot of the man standing at the traffic light.  What are you showing us with this photo (and the others)?
  • The composition of the vertical photos are all very similar with a hard vertical line down the "third" point of the frame - the store signs in the gap photo, the traffic light, the line of buildings in the "Calvert" photo and the columns in the Grocer billboard photo.  It may be interesting to present these as a triptych or some other set to show a theme in your composition.  But be careful in that applying the same composition every time can become boring very quickly for the viewer.  We don't have the same experience of the photo as you (with the sounds, smells, action, etc.), so you need to engage us visually.  Mix things up.  For example, the rows of shops themselves may be more interesting than the long empty sidewalk stretching out beside them - make them your subject.  The food truck shots are simply centered "whole" shots of the trailer/truck - fine as information ("Here's a food truck"), but not terribly engaging for the viewer.  Show us why we might want to go there, or that other people do.  (Though, I'd be very curious to try what they've got at the Duck Truck, which, ironically, isn't a truck.)  Take some time to reflect on each of them individually and as a group - Does this single photo work on its own?  What is the subject here? Does it build upon the last one or few to tell a story or give a sense of being there? etc.
  • With all that said, though, you've passed the first hurdles - getting out there and making the shots and then opening yourself up to random strangers on the internet (savages, we are).  Neither of which can be easy to do.  I get the feeling you were trying to convey a sense of being in Shoreditch - a documentation of some elements of life there: rows of interesting shops (leaving aside the Gap, perhaps), people about, some food truck culture, some common elements of graffiti and a clever sign writer.  That's just my impression, at least, from these first photos.  
Link to post
Share on other sites

A few thoughts:

  • Posting your before and after photos is unnecessary. Most of them aren't different enough from the original (in these small web JPGs, at least) to mean much to anyone but you. Show us your final vision. I will say this small bit about post-processing, though... If you're presenting these as a set or a "portfolio" of Shoreditch you'll be well served to have a consistent look about them. The "Barber & Parlour" shot, for instance, is vastly different from the rest and seems really out of place. Was there some reason for the heavy processing in that shot? Does it feel more like Shoreditch to you? Is that processing helping to convey your meaning or the feeling of the place? Would it be appropriate to use that on all of the photos in this set?
  • I find the photos to generally be lacking a subject or focus. My eye doesn't know where to look in many of the shots. The "Gap" shot, for instance... what is this showing me? I do like the graphic element of the line of signs, but the one closest to us is out of focus and the others are shrouded behind it, so are unreadable. My eye is left to wander about trying to land on some information, moment, or aspect of Shoreditch that you are trying to portray. If you had perhaps moved a bit to your left, this could act as leading lines to the lady in the middle. Similar for the shot of the man standing at the traffic light. What are you showing us with this photo (and the others)?
  • The composition of the vertical photos are all very similar with a hard vertical line down the "third" point of the frame - the store signs in the gap photo, the traffic light, the line of buildings in the "Calvert" photo and the columns in the Grocer billboard photo. It may be interesting to present these as a triptych or some other set to show a theme in your composition. But be careful in that applying the same composition every time can become boring very quickly for the viewer. We don't have the same experience of the photo as you (with the sounds, smells, action, etc.), so you need to engage us visually. Mix things up. For example, the rows of shops themselves may be more interesting than the long empty sidewalk stretching out beside them - make them your subject. The food truck shots are simply centered "whole" shots of the trailer/truck - fine as information ("Here's a food truck"), but not terribly engaging for the viewer. Show us why we might want to go there, or that other people do. (Though, I'd be very curious to try what they've got at the Duck Truck, which, ironically, isn't a truck.) Take some time to reflect on each of them individually and as a group - Does this single photo work on its own? What is the subject here? Does it build upon the last one or few to tell a story or give a sense of being there? etc.
  • With all that said, though, you've passed the first hurdles - getting out there and making the shots and then opening yourself up to random strangers on the internet (savages, we are). Neither of which can be easy to do. I get the feeling you were trying to convey a sense of being in Shoreditch - a documentation of some elements of life there: rows of interesting shops (leaving aside the Gap, perhaps), people about, some food truck culture, some common elements of graffiti and a clever sign writer. That's just my impression, at least, from these first photos.

Thank you, so far I've had some positive comments but the feedback you have provided is what I was looking for!

 

I am half tempted to get back to the same locations to take those shots again and think about composition, but really on my next walk about I will thinking about those points above.

 

Thank you once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • It is really easy to find out if the wifi is on. Your computer or tablet or cell phone will have a network settings dealing with wifi, bluetooth, ethernet or “other”. Open that up and go into the section for wifi, and take note of which networks are listed. Turn on the camera and keep watching the list of networks. If your camera’s wifi is turned on, a new network should suddenly show up in your computer/tablet/phone’s network listings. Now go into the camera’s menus and start a wireless connection (the x-app or camera remote app can help you with this). You should see a network show up now. It is not hidden because it has to be visible so that your computer/tablet/phone can join the camera’s network to transfer images. Turn the camera off and that network should disappear. Turn the camera back on and see what happens.
    • Sweet Creek Falls, Oregon. X-H1, Viltrox 13mm F1.4, Acros.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

    • I think my Fuji 150-600 F8 is a brilliant wildlife lens in terms of sharpness, portability and value but the small aperture does cause issues at the start and end of the day - even pushing the ISO as far as I dare, I can see shutter speed down to 1/25s - stabilisation isn't an issue but asking a deer to stand still for that is too much! In the same situation, an F4 would give 1/100s so the difference to the success rate would be phenomenal... and that's without the other improvements like shallower depth of field. I also find that the Fuji's subject detect AF gets pretty iffy in low light - I keep updating to the latest firmware but it doesn't seem to get any better. I was originally looking at the Nikon 500mm F4 E but good examples secondhand are still reasonably expensive but like-for-like Sigma lenses are around half the price. Reviews I have read suggest that they are as good optically, AF performance and IS-wise but you gain a few hundred grams of weight (but less than the older Nikon model). For a couple of grand, I can live with that. Does anyone have any experience mounting one on an XH2S? What about with the 1.4 teleconverter? It feels like that is pushing it anyway - hefty lens + TC + Fringer all sounds a bit...wobbly? It is on the Fringer approved list but I am wary about AF speed in particular. I had also considered looking for a used Nikon 400mm F2.8, which would be even faster (and heavier) and could couple with a TC to give 560mm F4 but again, it is that lens+TC+Fringer combination that worries me as being just too many links in the chain. Of course, what I really want is a native Fuji prime but that doesn't seem to be on the horizon - and if you look at what Nikon and Sony are doing, if Fuji do ever bring out a 500mm prime, it will probably be a small, light and cheapish F5.6, which is only 2/3 stop better than my zoom at the same focal length. Any thoughts anyone?
    • The Amazon link is an annoying feature of this forum - its automatic and is applied to every post for advertising purposes. My question was - how do you know the camera wi-fi is on and requires turning off? I would have thought this would just use up the battery for no purpose if you aren't specifically using a function that requires wi-fi.
    • I've made a point to push Angelbird memory products as they are the best performance cards you can get, The sustained write speed is important.
×
×
  • Create New...