Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

I just bought my first Fuji camera, a X-Pro2 with a 35mm f.2 attached to it. Needless to say I'm new to this forum, and this is my first question.

I will most likely be using the camera mainly with OVF. This said, I wonder if the Power Management mode setting (High Performance vs. Standard) would affect the AF speed in any way. Fuji doesn't make a distinction and says both settings provide 'Fast AF Speed'. I don't seem to notice any difference myself, but maybe the difference becomes clear in particular situations?

 

Thanks for your thoughts/feedback!

tdG. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HPM = more fps (readout) = more AF samples = better AF (tracking) performance.

 

... without compromising the amount of shots you can take? Fuji predicts for both settings a total amount of shots of 350 on one battery charge. Only Economy mode will provide a higher amount, up to 380 shots.

This, and the fact I'm not 'feeling' any true difference in AF Speed, makes me suspicious that there would be a benefit of the High Performance setting using the OVF. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount of shots per battery charge is dependent on so many parameters that it's IMO barely worth speculating about!

 

Extreme examples?

 

Put a fresh batter in your camera, set it to CH, press and hold the shutter until the battery dies... How many shots did you get? 2000 maybe!

 

Now put a fresh battery in your camera, take a shot.

 

Use the internal raw convertor to make a jpeg copy in every single film sim, with every combination of shad/tone sharp/nr setting.

 

Then go through your menus and toggle every single item off and on

 

Oh your battery just died, and you only took one shot...

 

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

I KNOW I AM BEING A BIT SILLY

 

But real world derivatives of the above 2 examples determine your shots per charge more than any other factor...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. IMHO my shooting habits affect battery life more than anything else. When I'm working, I typically keep the cameras set to EVF + Eye Sensor, and turn them off if I'm going to go more than a few minutes without using them. I can consistently get 600 shots to a charge that way with a bit of image review/focus checking.

 

Personally, I keep HPM off on my bodies. The AF seemed ever so slightly faster, but it also seemed to rack focus more. I didn't think the difference in speed was really noticeable, and the extra hunting was annoying with the EVF.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, thanks for your feedback, but will you please stick with the subject!? I know there are a zillion things that affect the battery life of a digital camera, but that was not my question. I want to know if there is a difference in focusing performance (AF Speed) for single shots - not continuous/tracking - when the OVF is used and HPM or SM power management is considered. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I use a TECHART ring to mount Canon EF lenses on the GFX 50S-II and 100S-II, maintaining image stabilization and autofocus. The only limitation are lenses with a small rear element diameter that make it impossible to cover medium format. Fast lenses like the EF 85/1.2L or the 100-400L, however, work great.
    • I also use a Nikon to GFX Fringer and it works very well.  24mm f/1.8 vignettes so best used on 35mm mode.  50mm f/1.8 covers the entire frame very well with no issues and is a superb little lens. 105mm Sigma vignettes slightly but is perfectly usable. 300 f/4 likewise the 105.  I have a 70-200 f/20+.8 incoming to test so will report back but I'm expecting a little vignetting.  Even in 35mm mode the image is still 60MP and if you're prepared to manually crop and correct you can get 80-90 MP images.  I also have a C/Y to GFX adapter.  The 24mm Sigma Superwide vignettes strongly. Ditto 28-80 Zeiss Sonnar. 80-200 f/4 Sonnar is perfectly usable. All work fine as 35mm mode lenses.  I also have an M42 adapter which I tried with the Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm f/3.5 with good results. 
    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...