Jump to content

Recommended Posts

First time posting. 

Anyone else out there waiting for Fujifilm to announce a 10mm f/2 or 12mm f/2 - essentially any ultra wide fast prime?

I have pretty much all the wide angle lenses by Fujifilm, but haven't quite found the right set up yet:

9mm f/2.8 Laowa is surprisingly decent, but manual focus obviously and doesn't have the Fujifilm quality.

8-16mm f/2.8 is an amazing lens but massive and heavy.

10-24mm f/4 is very good but a bit soft in the corners at 10-12mm.

14mm f/2.8 is razor sharp but a bit of a strange focal length and I'm planning to sell this one.

16mm f/1.4 is one of my all-time favourite lenses and ideal for many things, but it's not UWA. 

There was talk of a 10mm a while back. In fact even the poll that was done put a 10mm f/2 out on top.

Does anyone know what happened? Is there still any chance? Would it be pretty big itself?

Edited by mcall
Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a very good Zeiss Touit 12mm for Fuji X mount. Not cheap, but well-adapted to Fuji. A 10mm f2 would be pretty big. Comparable lenses in FF are often f2.8 for that reason. Most users don't need f2 in an ultra-wide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...