Xfx2 versu XFx1.4 teleconverter- opinion

[LeesKeys]

I have the new XF 70-300mm on order and am trying to decide between the 1.4 and 2x converter. I will be using lens + converter mainly for wildlife/bird photography. Yes I know that the 2x will drop my max aperture by 2 stops, and the 1.4 by 1 stop. I'm wondering if any one has actual hands-on experiences with these converters. I would love to hear your observations.

Edited March 17, 2021 by LeesKeys
spelling

[tractorboyx]

I've had my 70-300 about 5 days, and im very impressed (enough to sell my 55-200).

Used it with both converters at 300mm, and i found the 2x very difficult to hold steady, the 1.4x is a lot easier, but even the IS and OIS miss a few shots.

There is definitely a minimal loss in quality with both converters, as to be expected.

I think using it with the 1.4x is a great option to have, but the 100-400 would be a better. 

 

[mokba]

I’ve had some pretty similar results. I’m leaving use of the 2x for use on the tripod. I’ve had fairly decent luck with the 1.4x handheld but only using an ibis equipped body. 

[CatsAreGods]

On 3/21/2021 at 1:56 PM, tractorboyx said:

I think using it with the 1.4x is a great option to have, but the 100-400 would be a better. 

I wish Fujifilm (or, as rumors have it, Sigma or someone) would make a 600 prime, or maybe 300-600 zoom for wildlife/bird photography.