Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I normally replace my lithium ion batteries when they will not go over 20% of their original capacity.  That seems to be the point when I may notice a bulge in the battery, as well.  If you want to refresh your battery, you can charge it, let it cool (has chip in the battery), take photos with e-shutter, then charge again.

Also, you may do some troubleshooting by taking the battery out for 2wks (good time to order a second battery), to determine if it still drains.  Also, can check the contacts to see if they have corrosion.

Fuji's manual insinuates that a significant battery life is drained even while sitting for 2 days:
"The battery gradually loses its charge when not in use. Charge the battery one or two days before use."
http://fujifilm-dsc.com/en/manual/x-t3/first_step/battery_charge/index.html

The manual also has a section that says this:
"Performance may be impaired if the battery is left unused for extended periods when fully charged. Run the battery flat before storing it. If the camera will not be used for an extended period, remove the battery and store it in a dry place with an ambient..."

I hope something in this helps and that I have written clearly.  :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Matsonfamily.

I have 6 original batteries with all the same problem. I never had this issue with my T1, and behoor the T1 with all my Nikon cameras. The camera was send to Fuji twice. The first time it came back with the note that the motherboard was repaired. The second time, they could not find, what they call Wandering Energy.

As all those tests are done without a lens connected, I did the same test with the 18-55mm on camera. At the start on july 5th, the battery was 100% full charged. And now this morning 10:00 a.m. the battery only has 54% energy left. 

So I am not very happy about this. Is this an issue that exist in all fujicamera's?

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Elly3, after reading your reply, i have looked up and found others that claim their battery drains in-camera more than it did for other Fuji models.  Perhaps this is a problem with the X-T3.  I'd like to see someone else's take on this.  What was the native phrase they used for "wandering energy?"  (assuming you speak dutch?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah, zwerf Stroom (stray current/amperage?) sounds like ground faults, when wiring is able to find a path to the "ground".  Often when insulation is worn down.  That seems like something physically wrong with the camera... but at the same time I find others complaining of this, too.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, matsonfamily said:

 That seems like something physically wrong with the camera... but at the same time I find others complaining of this, too.  

And, is there a solution found to this problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, unlike your experience, I found a user on a competing forum claiming that they had it fixed by Fuji:
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4437438?page=2

EDIT:  (confirms your Streustrom comment)

some comments:

"Fuji took the camera in under warranty and the power board was found to be faulty. Quick painless turnaround and now have no power drain issues. Also seems to have improved battery performance in general."

"I received my X-T3 back from the Fujifilm Service Center today. The main circuit board was replaced on 22 nov. Assuming they put in a fully charged battery on that date, it now still shows fully charged, while before the fix it would have been almost empty. Seems that the problem is solved. Camera has been away for 16 days, no charges as it was still under guarantee. For now I say: Good service....After repair, no battery drain anymore when camera is switched off."

Edited by matsonfamily
Link to post
Share on other sites

This could mean that this issue happens with more camera's. And that Fuji knows about this problem and that Fuji has a solution for it as well.

Thank you so much. I will send my camera again to Fuji with these comments. When I have the results, I will inform you.

😀 Elly3

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 7/15/2020 at 6:24 PM, matsonfamily said:

that sounds great!  Good news is precious in 2020.  :) 

Hello everybody, it took a while but my camera is now fixed by Fujifilm in Kleve. A new motherboard is the solution.

As Fuji is not so happy to fix this problem. So I made a paper with the loss of energy in 2 weeks time. There were no charges as it is still under garantee.

Have a good day 

Elly3😉

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A fungus in the forest.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

      (p.s. Open Topic.)  
    • The backslashes you are referring are just symbols denoting path.  Once you import into these LUTS into Davinci Resolve those backslashes are removed by default and you only see is the true file name which has no backslashes.  Convince yourself of this by opening the LUT folder from the Davinci Resolve Project Settings.  Do you see any backslashes in those LUT names? Of course not.  The only name you see is the one that has the underscores and the periods. These LUTS work as designed without having to change any path names.  However, they need to be set up properly through CSTs and by what is supported in Davinci Resolve.  Hence, the FLog2C film simulation LUTS cannot be used because Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut color space and the FLog2C gamut. Alternatively, Davinci Resolve does support Flog2 film simulation LUTS because the color space for FLog2 is Rec 2020 and there is an FLog2 gamut. If all you are doing is changing the path names then you are not getting the correct results.
    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
×
×
  • Create New...