Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have read with interest many threads in this section about photo bags, each one fancier than the next.

 

Well, I'm certainly not lacking interest in those specialized photo bags (for my Nikon gear, I own a large, wonderful Kiboko and a smaller Manfrotto), but as regards my Fuji kit, it sort of felt natural for me to stay away from those great products that scream "photo bag! steal me!", and rather select a nondescript, unobtrusive, everyday bag.

 

Honestly? OK, I have to admit that I first fell for one of those Billingham trendy things, but strangely enough, considering the praise they usually receive, I was not at all convinced by the quality, the way the various components adjusted, and the like. So, the Billingham was promptly discarded and now sits untouched in a closet in the garage.

 

Then, I went all the way along Nondescript Avenue and simply bought an Eastpak backpack, in leather (two, in fact: a black one, a light tan one), and then a cloth Timberland one, slightly smaller (photos below are not to size). All of those are great, do a wonderful job of containing the body in the front pocket and the lenses and other small accessories in the main pocket. The only thing to keep in mind is that you have to procure soft leather pouches for your lenses, so they don't rub and scratch against one another while in the backpack's main compartment. Those can be obtained very inexpensively on eBay from Chinese vendors. Beware, though: there are good ones, and bad, ugfly ones.

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

Any of those backpacks hold very comfortably a 16/1.4, a 23/1.4, a 35/1.4, a 56/1.2 and a 90/2, not to mention a 55~200 zoom when needed, and there is still plenty of extra room for a bottle of water, a sandwich, a sweater or windbreaker... not to mention the back pocket which is perfect for a book, a Kindle, an iPad or even a notebook computer.

 

The backpacks are light, very discrete, they don't advertise their contents, they have been well used by now and therefore they look suitably worn (and they seem quite durable), and they are, in my opinion, by far the best option to carry a light mirrorless kit.

 

The only thing they're missing is the possibility to attach a tripod, but for when I want this, I have bought two Billingham leather straps which I can jury-rig to the shoulder straps of any backpack, so as to secure the tripod horizontally under the backpack. It's worked just fine a couple of times so far.

 

I hope this feedback can help others who might be interested in the "non-photo bag" option.

 

The only drawback I can see is limited protection against rain (even though that remains to be tested, maybe it isn't so bad), but here again one can improvise, either with a plastic trash bag, or with the rain cover from a genuine photo bag: the one that comes with my Manfrotto backpack will do just fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...