Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It seems that the EVF (and LCD) live preview always shows the target (selected) exposure value, even if the shutter/ISO/aperture settings cannot achieve the correct exposure.

For example, the attached image shows me taking a picture using X-T30, of a dimly lit room in the evening, with a kit lens at auto aperture (chosen as f/3.5 by the camera), ISO set to 100, and shutter set to 4000. The exposure dial is set to +2.0. Although it's obvious that this image will be completely black when taken, the LCD shows a slightly overexposed image (corresponding to the EV wheel setting) and the EV indicator shows +2.0. Taking the shot will result in a completely black picture. In practice, this can be very misleading because it shows the exposure which will not be achieved and it's easy to ruin a shot accidentally.

Shooting in manual doesn't have this issue, i.e. as soon as I select this same f/3.5 aperture manually, the preview shows the correct exposure (completely black). From that point on the preview reacts to changes in ISO and SS.

I've used other MLCs (Sony a6000 and Lumix GM1), and neither of them behaved this way. I also had a Nikon DSLR which would at least show the numerical EV value inside the OVF, so you would immediately see how far off the target exposure the settings are.

Even the histogram shows the exposure of the live preview, instead of the actual exposure of the final photo, so there isn't a single indicator on the EVF which indicates how far from the correct exposure the resulting image will be.

Is there a possibility to change this behavior anyhow, or perhaps least send a feature request somewhere to perhaps consider it for a future firmware release?

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, I just posted a question very similar to yours. I don't know the answer yet, but I can tell that when in priority mode, what you are seeing on the exposure indicator is whatever you have set in the exposure compensation dial (try adjusting it and you will see how it moves to exactly the value you have selected in the dial, whatever the scene and other settings may be). In manual mode this changes to indicate the actual exposure. I am hoping there's a way to getting that same functionality in priority mode.

Hope this helps clarify...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I agree with cbimages' comment about the unsuitable aperture. Additionally, the 1/4000 shutter speed and ISO 100 seem unsuitable to me for a low light situation. As a starting point, I would try something like ISO 1600 and a shutter speed of 1/60 in order to get the aperture into the lens' serviceable range, then adjust from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The poster is correct it seems the XT-1, 2 and 3 will not show the correct exposure in the LCD/EVF in shutter mode. Histogram has the same problem. Even if you bump the exposure to 1/4000 sec in a dark room the screen will still show a bright image with a normally exposed histogram. I thought this was supposed to be a wysiwyg screen/finder like the Sony’s in shutter mode.

anyone know why Fujifilm did this or have a work around.

Gary L. product photographer and long time Canon DSLR user new to Fuji.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a quick fix for you: push the disp button on the back.

You should get the back screen changing from 'live view' to a screen with the various settings displayed, one of which may be the actual frame you will get when the shutter is released. I wrote may because what appears on that screen is determined by you when you set up the camera. That frame will be correctly exposed for the setting you have chosen, in this discussion's case, it will be black.

Quite likely you have the live view enabled as well as the setting 'take photo even without a lens attached' turned on.

Look closely at the information you have on the screen. The aperture setting will be in red which means the camera is telling you the exposure is so bad it does not want to take the photo, but will if you force it.

Edited by jerryy
stranded preposition
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
    • I discovered this unmarked government installation today.  

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

×
×
  • Create New...