BandoCalrissian
-
Posts
4 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
BandoCalrissian reacted to jlmphotos in Medium Format Point & Shoot
So what? It's a freakin' beast of a camera. Great price now, and still available. I don't see the issue. I'd think if you are serious you'd want interchangeable -- or just grab the 50mm 3.5 and glue it on the front of the 50R. Heck, if I hadn't bought the 100s I'd buy another 50r. You have no idea how amazing that camera is.
My two cents.
-
BandoCalrissian reacted to Bside123 in X100F Amazing Low-Light, High ISO Performance
Fujifilm X100F
ISO 12,800 (Yes. That's correct!), 1/50 sec, f/4.0, Handheld, Available Light from LHS Window
-
BandoCalrissian reacted to Peters Dad in Budgetary GFX 100r
Yes, physical dials please. Yes, I'm old, and yes, I'm old school in that regard. A 100R might convince me to invest in the big lenses and lug them around. I would even settle for a revamped 50R with IBIS- I like that idea too.
-
BandoCalrissian reacted to Paul Reading in Has the X-Pro3 been a success?
I love my X-Pro2 but I would not "upgrade" to the X-Pro3, I don't like the flippy screen and definitely not the way it has been implemented. I don't like the rubbery finish. The X-Pro was supposed to be the leading edge APS-C camera but clearly that is the X-T4 or possibly the X-H2 very soon. To me the X-Pro is the right size but has been forgotten. I really don't want an SLR anymore but to me the X-Pro3 misses the mark.
So has it been a success compared to the X-Pro2? I am wondering if the replacement will return to amore conventional X-Pro2 style format without the gimmicks.