Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know most of you think the EVF doesn't lag in low light. And for the most part I agree, the EVFD gets more noisy but the refresh rate still high.

But I shoot with a flash in low light, so I turn my exposure preview off. So try this on your XT1s and see if you get the same lag I get, set the lens to f8, go somewhere relatively low light, and then half press the shutter... Can you see the lag?

The only way for me to get rid of the lag is just to mash the shutter and not do the half press. I don't like shooting like this because it feels like I get a slight shutter lag, compared to half pressing the shutter and waiting for the right moment (I use AFC with AF button set to AF and the shutter release set to exposure metering).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know most of you think the EVF doesn't lag in low light. And for the most part I agree, the EVFD gets more noisy but the refresh rate still high.

 

But I shoot with a flash in low light, so I turn my exposure preview off. So try this on your XT1s and see if you get the same lag I get, set the lens to f8, go somewhere relatively low light, and then half press the shutter... Can you see the lag?

 

The only way for me to get rid of the lag is just to mash the shutter and not do the half press. I don't like shooting like this because it feels like I get a slight shutter lag, compared to half pressing the shutter and waiting for the right moment (I use AFC with AF button set to AF and the shutter release set to exposure metering).

This happens because when you half press you will also get a DOF preview of your image. 

When you half press, the aperture blades will close down to your chosen aperture (compared to being wide open when not half pressing).

There's hardly any light hitting the sensor so the EVF cant maintain its refresh rate

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happens because when you half press you will also get a DOF preview of your image.

When you half press, the aperture blades will close down to your chosen aperture (compared to being wide open when not half pressing).

There's hardly any light hitting the sensor so the EVF cant maintain its refresh rate

Wow. I saw this kind of lag on e2, and sometimes on x-t10 while testing.

Is it possible to turn off dof preview? On my sony a77 there is no this kind of lag.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I know you can't turn it off :(

 

Wow. I saw this kind of lag on e2, and sometimes on x-t10 while testing.

Is it possible to turn off dof preview? On my sony a77 there is no this kind of lag.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really have to question why anybody would be trying to shoot at f/8 in 'low light'. Maybe my definition of 'low light' is different to yours, but for me, 'low light' means ISO 3200-6400, f/2 (or faster) and 1/125th is still underexposing by more than a stop.

Yes, the aperture stopping down to f/8 will reduce the light coming into the camera dramatically and induce some EVF lag, but if you're in that dark a space with that small an aperture, I wonder what on earth it is you're trying to photograph.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really have to question why anybody would be trying to shoot at f/8 in 'low light'. Maybe my definition of 'low light' is different to yours, but for me, 'low light' means ISO 3200-6400, f/2 (or faster) and 1/125th is still underexposing by more than a stop.

 

Yes, the aperture stopping down to f/8 will reduce the light coming into the camera dramatically and induce some EVF lag, but if you're in that dark a space with that small an aperture, I wonder what on earth it is you're trying to photograph.

I guess he wants greater DOF. That's quite often situation for events shooting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well duh. But f/8 is a helluva thing indoors. I do events in minimal light—the settings I listed before are very common for me to use and I still end up pushing the files half a stop or so in post—and if I'm looking to get a whole room reasonably in focus, we're probably talking about f/3.2-4 on a 28mm lens or wider. In fact I'm often left cursing how large the depth of field is, even at f/2.8, on some of the wider lenses to get a whole room in shot. There's a reason why the 14mm never needs to be stopped down.

I'm not saying it's wrong/impossible/whatever, I'm just trying to get my head around the concept of a 'low light' situation which calls for such an aperture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your settings are really common for indoor ambient light. Adding a flash will make it possible to shoot @ f/8. With 56mm that's quite reasonable aperture to get all in focus. I like ambient light more too but that doesn't mean one won't like to shoot with flash and large DOF.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • (Open Thread) Not a winter landscape, but still cold.

      Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

      Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

       
    • agreed on the upload but based on the location and number it sounds exactly like the storage slot 1 status icon
    • All three of my bodies (X-E2, X-T4, GFX100S II) have shoot without lenses enabled and they have all had it set since I bought them.  No harm in it at all. Just remember to set the focal length when you fit a manual lens with no electronics otherwise the IBIS (if you have it) goes nuts. I regularly use vintage film lenses from Minolta, Zeiss, Mamiya, Rollei and others on my X mounts along with more modern manual focus stuff from TTArtisans. I also use Nikon AF-S lenses with a Fringer so the world is your oyster! Vintage lenses can be an absolute bargain too - For example the Zeiss 135 f/35 in M42 is as cheap as chips and very sharp as is the excellent Minolta 35-70 Macro (which is also rebadged Leica). 
    • I'm not exaggerating when I say that I have searched with great vigor (and at great expense) for a way to capture IR images with a Fujifilm camera for which I didn't have to use major amounts of sharpening to bring out the best. Zooms, primes, Fuji, Tamron, Viltrox, Sigma, Zeiss ... probably 20 lenses all told. Plus multiple IR converted Fuji cameras, X-T1, X-T3, X-T5. I even tried different ways of filtering IR, such as using the Kolari clip-ins and lens-mounted front filters. I was ready to give up until I almost accidentally tried one of the cheapest lenses out there -- the little TTArtisan 27mm F2.8. No hotspots that I could see, and best of all ABSOLUTELY SUPERB SHARPNESS across the entire frame. It's this attribute that I search for, and until now, never achieved. In my prior attempts, I listened to the advice from the "pundits", picking up a copy of the venerable Fuji 14mm F2.8, the Zeiss Touitt 12mm F2.8, Fuji 23 and 35mm F2.0, even the very similar 7Artisans 27mm F2.8, and none of them come even close to the TTArtisan for edge sharpness in infrared. Incidentally, I'm using a Kolari 720nm clip-in filter. Sure the TT has its issues -- vignetting at 2.8, tendency to flare with sunlight nearby, but all in all, this lens is glued to my X-T5 for now. This image was taken hand-held with this lens -- completely unedited!
    • Hy there When Im using the fan001 on the XH2s and I flip the LCD Screen vertically by 180 degrees then the image flips vertically, what is good but it also flips horizontally. The clean feed on HDMI is not flipping horizontally but its also flipping if the HDMI output info display is on. When I unmount the fan then the image flips only vertically. My firmware is updated to the latest version. Any ideas if there is a fix for that?
×
×
  • Create New...