Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I've just bought a Godox AD200 with an XPro F trigger, and I'm looking for some help to understand why I get a color and exposure shift while using TTL vs. using it on manual mode, using the same settings.

 

I'm attaching an example to explain the current behavior:

- The image on the top has been taken with TTL

- The image on the bottom has been taken in manual mode.  I've used the TTL-Convert-Manual (TCM) function to convert the first shot TTL settings to manual mode. 

 

I would expect the images to be the same since, in theory, I'm using the same settings. 

 

But there's a big color difference and also about a half a stop difference regarding exposure.

 

Color temperature:

- There's a difference of 700k from what I can see on Lightroom (the TTL image reports 5900 on the  Temp slider while the manual image reports 5200 on the Temp slider)

- There is also a minimal difference in the Tint slider (10 for the TTL image vs. 15 for the manual image)

 

Exposure:

- To get the image taken in manual mode to look the same regarding exposure, I have to increase the exposure by about +0,45   

 

Some additional info:

- I'm using Auto White Balance

- Shutter speed 200. Aperture 8. I've taken a test shot, and there's no ambient light affecting the images

- I'm using the AD200 without any modifier pointed to the ceiling to bounce the light

- The histogram on the left is from the top image (TTL). The histogram on the right is from the bottom image (manual)

- I'm using a Fuji X-T2 with the Godox XPro F trigger

 

Here's a link to the RAW images in case you want to compare them:


 

 

 

Are these differences between TTL mode and Manual mode expected, even using the same settings?  

 

Thanks in advance

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Carlos Mendes
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi, Carlos. I found your older thread, because I made the same experience. 

 

X-T2, 2x AD 2oo in brolly boxes, X-Pro2 as trigger and a huge color shift when using TCM. In TTL, I got clean colors, converted to manual, I got a massive blueish colorcast. And again, AWB, and I guess, that could be the reason. Didn't had time on the shoot to switch to 5600 K as WB. But I will test it asap. 

 

Mario

Edited by MarioM
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • I found the reddit topic i refere to :  https://www.reddit.com/r/davinciresolve/comments/1pc3f1e/cant_apply_new_fujifilm_gfx_55_lut/ "Update for y'all, It's just like what @ExpBalSat said, it's because of the backslashes in the names break them. I changed the file name and it works now. "   For me it was the solution. Realy annoying if it doesn’t work for you 😕  
    • Here is the solution to using the Eterna 55 file simulation LUTs in Davinci Resolve.   In general, do not use the FLog2C to film simulation LUTs as they are not supported by Davinci Resolve for two reasons: 1) Davinci Resolve does not support Fuji Gamut Color Space and 2) Davinci Resolve does not support FLog2C gamma.  Instead, use Flog2 which is supported by Davinci Resolve.  Here is an example.  Let's say that you want to use Classic Chrome simulation.  Do the following: Complete your color grade and use a CST to get to Rec 709. Add a node.  Use a CST to convert from Rec 709 to FLog2.  Output Color space is Rec 2020 and Outout Gamut is FLog2. Add a node.  Apply the FLog2 to Classic Chrome LUT Create a combination node from node in steps 2 and 3. Apply a Key to the combination node and adjust the Key Output Gain to get the amount of the combination node that you want applied. So that you do not have to do this over and over again, generate a LUT for the combination node.  Remember to turn off all other nodes before generating the LUT. Hope this helps others. Don  
    • Thanks for the insights. I think it's really hard to make a decision without having the two side by side! 
    • I don’t have the 23 f2 but I have read several times that it is considered a little soft at close distance, compared to the 23 f1.4 lenses. These will also focus at shorter distance from the subject, esp. the new one. So that might make a difference. The new 23 f1.4 LM WR  has better resolution, esp. in regard to the 40Mpix sensors, which you don’t have on the X-T2. What practical difference that makes for the value of the pictures one makes is disputable and subjective.  f1.4 will gather more light but with a smaller DOF, which may be desirable in some situations but not so in others, depends. If you like to shoot close ups, you will probably use higher f numbers to get a bigger DOF. Same for landscapes. If you are a bokeh fan, yes the f1.4 lens are better.  The older 23 f1.4 lens that you are considering is a very good and respected lens. The f1.4 vs f2 aperture per se is perhaps not so important. The 23 f2 is very small, light and practical and a great lens for travel and landscapes. So, go figure. I am afraid I just sent you further down the road to insanity !
    • First post here but long time fuji shorter. I use the XT2 with the 23mm f2 / 35mm 1.4 / 16-80mm f4 I'm considering the 23mm f1.4 r (Non-WR) About me: - I shoot black and white only. - I like macro details to wide open landscapes and everything in-between. - I shoot mostly for art, intrigue and creativity of the image. My question - is the 23mm f1.4 going to offer me any meaningful difference over the f2 for the above scenarios Thanks and sorry for bringing it up again...
×
×
  • Create New...