Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I recently purchased a Konica 57mm F1.4 Hexanon EE in an Konica AR bayonet mount for my X-T1 with Firmware 3.1 from KEH.  It was in excellent condition.  A few observations:

 

- This is a smaller lens, but not Leica small.  For comparison to the Fuji 56/1.2 vs the Konica: filter size is 62mm filter vs 55mm; weight is 405 vs 280 grams; length is 70 mm vs 42mm (74 with adapter).  A Leica Summilux M is 50/1.4 is 46mm filter; 335 grm; 52mm length.  

 

- As expected the lens reminds me very much of the lenses I had in the 80s.  It looks good on the Fuji and a quick glance would suggest that it was a 80s vintage film camera.

 

- Handling is good.  Large focus ring with a nice through and nicely dampened.  Focus has infinity on the right like Leica lenses, but opposite from Fuji.  The aperture ring has rather stiff clicks on the half stops.  Close focus is about 1.5 feet--very nice.

 

- At F1.4 the lens is nicely sharp in the center, a little soft in the corners, slightly low contrast.  By F2.8 its clearly up well.  Note, compared to the Fuji 35mm, it never catches up, but I'm more than happy at all apertures. 

 

- Focus Peaking works great with this lens.  The edges just glow including the eye's iris edge and eyelids edges. Still, at F1.4 with a tight headshot, I'm probably at 50% in focus at 1:1 in LR.  Maybe with practice this will get better--but that's my issue not the lens.  

 

Here are some photos of lens and brick walls and my daughter.  SOC untouched.  

https://www.flickr.com/photos/mdecorte/sets/72157652851926514/

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

After picking up a couple of Hexanons for $5 each at the thrift store, I grabbed an adapter for my X-E1 and found that the flange distance of the Konica is shorter than most 35mm systems (esp. Nikon.) So I found a 24mm f2.8 on eBay and am now in heaven. It's a great little lens the Hexanon 24mm - if you're into that focal length (36mm equiv) look for the series that has an f22 maximum - it's a smaller and better lens than the ones that only close down to f16. It's no bigger, with adapter, than the 18-55.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Thank you. I will research it.
    • Ahh, the infamous brick wall photos… 😀 According to internet lore, if the dng converter does not properly apply the corrections, you can have it apply custom profiles that should work for you. How to do that is waaaaaay outside of this comment’s scope, but there are plenty of sites listed in the search engines that step you through the processes. Best wishes.
    • Jerry Thank you very much. That is extremely helpful. It seems that the camera and the lens have the latest firmware update, so it appears that the corrections should be applied automatically. The lens arrived this afternoon and I took some quick test shots, in which the correct lens information appeared in the EXIF files, so that sounds good. I used Adobe DNG converter to convert the Raw (RAF) files, and then opened the DNG files and saved them in PSD format. However, with a beautiful, clear, cloudless blue sky, there were no lines near the edges to check if distortion had been corrected. Another day I plan to photograph a brick wall. Thank you for your help.
    • Typically you need to make sure the lens is compatible with the camera, i.e. check the lens compatibility charts for your camera, then make sure the respective firmwares are updated so older issues are resolved. After that, each lens has a manufacturer’s profile which will be embedded into the raw file meta data for the images captured using that lens. From there, it is up to the raw conversion software to apply the lens correction to the image. Different converters do that differently, some automatically, some only if a setting is turned on. For in-camera jpegs, the on-board converter does the corrections automatically, assuming the camera recognizes the lens, it applies a generic profile otherwise. I do not know if that can be turned off or not.
    • How does one make sure that Fuji's image correction is turned on to correct barrel and pin-cushion distortion on a GFX 100 or GFX100S when using the GF20-35? Is it only applied to the jpegs and not to the raw files? (I was surprised to discover the barrel distortion on the GF 35-70mm lens.) I normally shoot in raw with jpeg back-up and use the raw files, which I convert either in Affinity Photo 2 when editing with that program or in Raw File Converter Ex 3.0 by Silkypix if I wish to process the image in Photoshop CS6. (Adobe DNG is also a possibility.) Thank you for the help. Trevor
×
×
  • Create New...